PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCDMY vs. KMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

KCDMY vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KCDMY vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
10.18%55.77%-28.48%40.30%15.89%-3.90%-9.84%29.96%-4.95%4.36%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
-3.20%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KCDMY:

$7.08B

KMB:

$32.13B

EPS

KCDMY:

$12.49

KMB:

$6.06

PE Ratio

KCDMY:

0.94

KMB:

15.91

PEG Ratio

KCDMY:

0.07

KMB:

2.75

PS Ratio

KCDMY:

0.13

KMB:

1.87

PB Ratio

KCDMY:

0.98

KMB:

19.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

KCDMY:

$54.98B

KMB:

$17.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KCDMY:

$21.38B

KMB:

$6.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

KCDMY:

$14.55B

KMB:

$3.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCDMY achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's -3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, KCDMY has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 5.63%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.01% annualized return.


KCDMY

1D
1.72%
1M
-5.95%
YTD
10.18%
6M
14.38%
1Y
49.04%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
5.63%

KMB

1D
0.12%
1M
-12.36%
YTD
-3.20%
6M
-20.50%
1Y
-29.15%
3Y*
-6.89%
5Y*
-3.23%
10Y*
0.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Kimberly-Clark de Mexico

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Return for Risk

KCDMY vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCDMY
KCDMY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
KCDMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCDMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCDMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
KCDMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCDMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCDMY vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KCDMYKMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

-1.17

+2.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

-1.49

+3.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.78

+0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

-0.92

+4.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.56

-1.50

+14.05

KCDMY vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCDMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCDMY and KMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KCDMYKMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

-1.17

+2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

-0.16

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.00

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.46

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between KCDMY and KMB is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KCDMY vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

KCDMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than KMB's 5.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
4.38%4.82%12.08%3.96%4.24%6.72%4.70%4.08%5.16%7.20%5.68%3.98%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
5.25%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%

Drawdowns

KCDMY vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCDMY drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCDMY and KMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KCDMYKMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.61%

-36.97%

-37.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-30.70%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.82%

-31.73%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.87%

-31.73%

-11.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.24%

-31.64%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.60%

-8.74%

-37.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

18.99%

-15.01%

Volatility

KCDMY vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 6.74%. This indicates that KCDMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KCDMYKMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.93%

6.74%

+4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.40%

21.02%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.11%

24.96%

+5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.35%

19.79%

+12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.14%

20.83%

+13.31%

Financials

KCDMY vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark de Mexico and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
13.83B
4.08B
(KCDMY) Total Revenue
(KMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KCDMY vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimberly-Clark de Mexico and Kimberly-Clark Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
40.4%
35.9%
Portfolio components
KCDMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico reported a gross profit of 5.59B and revenue of 13.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.4%.

KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 4.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

KCDMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 13.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.9%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 507.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.

KCDMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico reported a net income of 2.16B and revenue of 13.83B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 499.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.