PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINC vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LINC vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LINC vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
68.45%52.65%57.57%73.40%-22.49%14.92%140.74%-15.62%58.42%5.21%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
15.71%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Fundamentals

EPS

LINC:

$0.64

COST:

$25.63

PE Ratio

LINC:

63.64

COST:

38.87

PEG Ratio

LINC:

2.24

COST:

3.04

PS Ratio

LINC:

2.46

COST:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

LINC:

$518.24M

COST:

$286.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LINC:

$293.98M

COST:

$19.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

LINC:

$45.58M

COST:

$12.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 68.45% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed COST with an annualized return of 32.28%, while COST has yielded a comparatively lower 22.28% annualized return.


LINC

1D
1.22%
1M
12.25%
YTD
68.45%
6M
73.11%
1Y
156.33%
3Y*
92.98%
5Y*
44.40%
10Y*
32.28%

COST

1D
-0.02%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
15.71%
6M
7.95%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
24.28%
10Y*
22.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINC vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINC
LINC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINC vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LINCCOSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.43

0.30

+3.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.66

0.57

+3.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.07

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.81

0.40

+5.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.25

0.80

+15.45

LINC vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LINCCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43

0.30

+3.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.08

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

1.02

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.59

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between LINC and COST is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LINC vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.52%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Drawdowns

LINC vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and COST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LINCCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-53.39%

-45.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.35%

-19.35%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.96%

-31.40%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.51%

-31.40%

-26.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-6.96%

+4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.58%

-13.40%

-46.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.78%

9.67%

+0.11%

Volatility

LINC vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.41%. This indicates that LINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LINCCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

4.41%

+6.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.57%

13.36%

+20.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.82%

20.15%

+25.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.25%

22.51%

+20.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.35%

21.90%

+35.45%

Financials

LINC vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
142.87M
69.60B
(LINC) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LINC vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
49.1%
-12.6%
Portfolio components
LINC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 70.10M and revenue of 142.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.

LINC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 17.74M and revenue of 142.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

LINC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 12.70M and revenue of 142.87M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.