PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINC vs. LAUR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LINC vs. LAUR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 95.07% return, which is significantly higher than LAUR's 8.64% return.


LINC

1D
-4.50%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
95.07%
6M
93.31%
1Y
104.03%
3Y*
96.07%
5Y*
43.18%
10Y*
42.03%

LAUR

1D
-1.64%
1M
10.45%
YTD
8.64%
6M
9.39%
1Y
58.84%
3Y*
49.15%
5Y*
40.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINC vs. LAUR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
95.07%52.65%57.57%73.40%-22.49%14.92%140.74%-15.62%58.42%0.50%
LAUR
Laureate Education, Inc.
8.64%84.09%33.41%50.20%-4.08%49.50%-17.32%15.55%12.39%8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LINC and LAUR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.18

The correlation between LINC and LAUR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LINC:

$0.72

LAUR:

$2.52

PE Ratio

LINC:

65.79

LAUR:

14.52

PEG Ratio

LINC:

2.31

LAUR:

0.08

PS Ratio

LINC:

2.71

LAUR:

2.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

LINC:

$544.69M

LAUR:

$1.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LINC:

$242.75M

LAUR:

$484.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

LINC:

$49.04M

LAUR:

$491.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINC vs. LAUR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINC
LINC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

LAUR
LAUR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LAUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAUR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LAUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAUR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINC vs. LAUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LINCLAURDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

3.62

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

10.77

-0.46

LINC vs. LAUR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the LAUR Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and LAUR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LINC vs. LAUR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than LAUR's maximum drawdown of -64.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and LAUR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINCLAURDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-64.52%

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.35%

-16.33%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-16.33%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.96%

-25.33%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.44%

-3.61%

-5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.99%

-14.89%

-44.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.13%

5.48%

+4.65%

Volatility

LINC vs. LAUR - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a higher volatility of 13.80% compared to Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR) at 9.81%. This indicates that LINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINCLAURDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.80%

9.81%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.45%

23.85%

+8.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.11%

32.32%

+14.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.19%

33.37%

+10.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.05%

40.10%

+16.95%

Dividends

LINC vs. LAUR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LINC nor LAUR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LAUR
Laureate Education, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.11%22.77%62.01%
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LINC vs. LAUR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and Laureate Education, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
143.96M
272.61M
(LINC) Total Revenue
(LAUR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LINC vs. LAUR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and Laureate Education, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
LINC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LAUR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Laureate Education, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 272.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LINC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

LAUR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Laureate Education, Inc. reported an operating income of -21.59M and revenue of 272.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.9%.

LINC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

LAUR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Laureate Education, Inc. reported a net income of -21.59M and revenue of 272.61M, resulting in a net margin of -7.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LINC and LAUR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LINC has higher volatility (13.80%) compared to LAUR (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINC dropped -99.11% vs LAUR's -64.52%.

LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINC and LAUR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer