PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
LINC vs. ADMA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

LINC vs. ADMA

Last updated May 10, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LINC or ADMA.

Correlation

The correlation between LINC and ADMA is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LINC vs. ADMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LINC:

1.49

ADMA:

2.64

Sortino Ratio

LINC:

2.39

ADMA:

3.45

Omega Ratio

LINC:

1.30

ADMA:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

LINC:

1.42

ADMA:

4.19

Martin Ratio

LINC:

6.99

ADMA:

12.52

Ulcer Index

LINC:

10.85%

ADMA:

15.11%

Daily Std Dev

LINC:

44.25%

ADMA:

72.18%

Max Drawdown

LINC:

-99.11%

ADMA:

-91.28%

Current Drawdown

LINC:

-5.42%

ADMA:

-18.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LINC:

$660.92M

ADMA:

$4.77B

EPS

LINC:

$0.32

ADMA:

$0.84

PE Ratio

LINC:

65.38

ADMA:

23.79

PEG Ratio

LINC:

1.86

ADMA:

0.00

PS Ratio

LINC:

1.50

ADMA:

11.19

PB Ratio

LINC:

3.31

ADMA:

16.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

LINC:

$336.70M

ADMA:

$344.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LINC:

$197.96M

ADMA:

$180.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

LINC:

$27.02M

ADMA:

$123.41M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than ADMA's 16.50% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed ADMA with an annualized return of 25.34%, while ADMA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.94% annualized return.

LINC

YTD

32.24%

1M

23.42%

6M

29.14%

1Y

65.51%

5Y*

53.10%

10Y*

25.34%

ADMA

YTD

16.50%

1M

3.04%

6M

-11.67%

1Y

188.31%

5Y*

52.75%

10Y*

9.94%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LINC vs. ADMA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LINC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LINC is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LINC is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LINC is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LINC is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LINC is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LINC is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
ADMA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ADMA is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ADMA is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ADMA is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ADMA is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ADMA is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ADMA is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LINC vs. ADMA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the ADMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and ADMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

LINC vs. ADMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither LINC nor ADMA has paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.43%
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LINC vs. ADMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than ADMA's maximum drawdown of -91.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and ADMA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

LINC vs. ADMA - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...

Financials

LINC vs. ADMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and ADMA Biologics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
119.37M
117.55M
(LINC) Total Revenue
(ADMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LINC vs. ADMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and ADMA Biologics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
-50.0%0.0%50.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
62.2%
53.9%
(LINC) Gross Margin
(ADMA) Gross Margin
LINC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 74.25M and revenue of 119.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.2%.

ADMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.33M and revenue of 117.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.

LINC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 10.93M and revenue of 119.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

ADMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 38.32M and revenue of 117.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.

LINC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 6.83M and revenue of 119.37M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

ADMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 111.90M and revenue of 117.55M, resulting in a net margin of 95.2%.