PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINC vs. ADMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LINC vs. ADMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 104.27% return, which is significantly higher than ADMA's -53.02% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed ADMA with an annualized return of 42.69%, while ADMA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.15% annualized return.


LINC

1D
1.86%
1M
1.92%
YTD
104.27%
6M
103.26%
1Y
119.44%
3Y*
99.10%
5Y*
44.87%
10Y*
42.69%

ADMA

1D
3.13%
1M
4.00%
YTD
-53.02%
6M
-56.89%
1Y
-51.69%
3Y*
30.34%
5Y*
38.86%
10Y*
2.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINC vs. ADMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
104.27%52.65%57.57%73.40%-22.49%14.92%140.74%-15.62%58.42%5.21%
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
-53.02%6.36%279.42%16.49%175.18%-27.69%-51.25%67.36%-25.55%-37.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LINC and ADMA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LINC:

$1.55B

ADMA:

$2.06B

EPS

LINC:

$0.72

ADMA:

$0.68

PE Ratio

LINC:

68.89

ADMA:

12.66

PS Ratio

LINC:

2.83

ADMA:

4.11

PB Ratio

LINC:

7.77

ADMA:

5.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

LINC:

$544.69M

ADMA:

$509.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LINC:

$242.75M

ADMA:

$312.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

LINC:

$49.04M

ADMA:

$218.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINC vs. ADMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINC
LINC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ADMA
ADMA Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ADMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADMA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ADMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADMA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINC vs. ADMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LINCADMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.82

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

-0.83

+5.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

-1.66

+13.52

LINC vs. ADMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the ADMA Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and ADMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LINC vs. ADMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than ADMA's maximum drawdown of -91.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and ADMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINCADMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-91.28%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.35%

-62.71%

+35.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-68.99%

+41.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.96%

-68.99%

+27.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.51%

-86.11%

+28.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.17%

-65.03%

+59.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.00%

-53.07%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.11%

31.23%

-21.12%

Volatility

LINC vs. ADMA - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a higher volatility of 13.01% compared to ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) at 10.25%. This indicates that LINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINCADMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.01%

10.25%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.10%

45.72%

-13.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.96%

54.23%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.15%

59.49%

-15.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.04%

69.07%

-12.03%

Dividends

LINC vs. ADMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither LINC nor ADMA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LINC vs. ADMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and ADMA Biologics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M20222023202420252026
143.96M
114.49M
(LINC) Total Revenue
(ADMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LINC vs. ADMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and ADMA Biologics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
70.5%
Portfolio components
LINC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ADMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.75M and revenue of 114.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.

LINC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

ADMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.27M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

LINC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

ADMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 45.33M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LINC and ADMA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LINC has higher volatility (13.01%) compared to ADMA (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINC dropped -99.11% vs ADMA's -91.28%.

LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINC and ADMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer