LINC vs. ADMA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA).

Performance

LINC vs. ADMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LINC vs. ADMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation	68.45%	52.65%	57.57%	73.40%	-22.49%	14.92%	140.74%	-15.62%	58.42%	5.21%
ADMA ADMA Biologics, Inc.	-50.60%	6.36%	279.42%	16.49%	175.18%	-27.69%	-51.25%	67.36%	-25.55%	-37.30%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LINC : $1.27B ADMA : $2.20B
EPS LINC : $0.64 ADMA : $0.60
PE Ratio LINC : 63.64 ADMA : 15.07
PS Ratio LINC : 2.46 ADMA : 4.34
PB Ratio LINC : 6.37 ADMA : 4.60
Total Revenue (TTM) LINC : $518.24M ADMA : $510.17M
Gross Profit (TTM) LINC : $293.98M ADMA : $292.77M
EBITDA (TTM) LINC : $45.58M ADMA : $195.35M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 68.45% return, which is significantly higher than ADMA's -50.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed ADMA with an annualized return of 32.28%, while ADMA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.68% annualized return.

LINC

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 12.25%
• YTD: 68.45%
• 6M: 73.11%
• 1Y: 156.33%
• 3Y*: 92.98%
• 5Y*: 44.40%
• 10Y*: 32.28%

ADMA

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -42.13%
• YTD: -50.60%
• 6M: -38.54%
• 1Y: -54.59%
• 3Y*: 39.63%
• 5Y*: 37.55%
• 10Y*: 0.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LINC vs. ADMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINC

LINC Risk / Return Rank: 96
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 95
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ADMA

ADMA Risk / Return Rank: 7
ADMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ADMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ADMA Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ADMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ADMA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINC vs. ADMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LINC	ADMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.43	-0.95	+4.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	-1.39	+5.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	0.82	+0.68
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.81	-0.84	+6.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.25	-1.86	+18.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LINC vs. ADMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the ADMA Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and ADMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LINC	ADMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43	-0.95	+4.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.63	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.01	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.01	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between LINC and ADMA is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LINC vs. ADMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither LINC nor ADMA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LINC vs. ADMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than ADMA's maximum drawdown of -91.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and ADMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINC	ADMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.11%	-91.28%	-7.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.35%	-66.18%	+38.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.96%	-66.18%	+24.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.51%	-87.33%	+29.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.24%	-63.24%	+61.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.58%	-52.91%	-6.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.78%	29.86%	-20.08%

Volatility

LINC vs. ADMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) is 10.68%, while ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) has a volatility of 31.94%. This indicates that LINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LINC	ADMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.68%	31.94%	-21.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.57%	44.54%	-10.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.82%	57.47%	-11.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.25%	60.00%	-16.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.35%	69.12%	-11.77%

Financials

LINC vs. ADMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and ADMA Biologics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LINC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 70.10M and revenue of 142.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

ADMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 88.82M and revenue of 139.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.

LINC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 17.74M and revenue of 142.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.

ADMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 62.75M and revenue of 139.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.

LINC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 12.70M and revenue of 142.87M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

ADMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 49.38M and revenue of 139.16M, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.