PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCDMY vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KCDMY vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KCDMY vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
10.18%55.77%-28.48%40.30%15.89%-3.90%-9.84%29.96%-4.95%4.36%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-4.42%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCDMY achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, KCDMY has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.63%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.


KCDMY

1D
1.72%
1M
-5.95%
YTD
10.18%
6M
14.38%
1Y
49.04%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
5.63%

VOO

1D
2.86%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Kimberly-Clark de Mexico

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Return for Risk

KCDMY vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCDMY
KCDMY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
KCDMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCDMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCDMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
KCDMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCDMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCDMY vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KCDMYVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

0.98

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

1.50

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

1.53

+2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.56

7.29

+5.26

KCDMY vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCDMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCDMY and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KCDMYVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

0.98

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.70

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.78

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.83

-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between KCDMY and VOO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KCDMY vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

KCDMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
4.38%4.82%12.08%3.96%4.24%6.72%4.70%4.08%5.16%7.20%5.68%3.98%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

KCDMY vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCDMY drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCDMY and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KCDMYVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.61%

-33.99%

-40.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-11.98%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.82%

-24.52%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.87%

-33.99%

-8.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.24%

-6.29%

-21.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.60%

-3.72%

-42.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

2.52%

+1.46%

Volatility

KCDMY vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that KCDMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KCDMYVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.93%

5.29%

+5.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.40%

9.44%

+11.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.11%

18.10%

+12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.35%

16.82%

+15.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.14%

17.99%

+16.15%