JHMM vs. JHMD
JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) and JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while JHMD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMM returned 8.57%/yr vs 8.79%/yr for JHMD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHMM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for JHMD.
Performance
JHMM vs. JHMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than JHMD's 8.43% return.
JHMM
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
JHMD
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
JHMM vs. JHMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 12.87% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 19.96% |
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 8.43% | 33.91% | 1.78% | 19.43% | -13.95% | 11.83% | 7.25% | 19.83% | -14.54% | 25.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMM and JHMD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.73 |
The correlation between JHMM and JHMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHMM vs. JHMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHMM
JHMD
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
JHMM
JHMD
Technology
JHMM
JHMD
Financial Services
JHMM
JHMD
Consumer Cyclical
JHMM
JHMD
Healthcare
JHMM
JHMD
Utilities
JHMM
JHMD
Energy
JHMM
JHMD
Real Estate
JHMM
JHMD
Basic Materials
JHMM
JHMD
Consumer Defensive
JHMM
JHMD
Communication Services
JHMM
JHMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMM vs. JHMD — Risk / Return Rank
JHMM
JHMD
JHMM vs. JHMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMM | JHMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.45 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 2.10 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.02 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.85 | 7.56 | +4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMM | JHMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.45 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.54 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.55 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
JHMM vs. JHMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than JHMD's maximum drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and JHMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMM | JHMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -35.67% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -11.23% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.88% | -13.38% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -29.38% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.98% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -6.73% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 3.00% | -0.77% |
Volatility
JHMM vs. JHMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.85%, while John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMM | JHMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 5.19% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 12.04% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 14.69% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 16.26% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 17.20% | +2.40% |
JHMM vs. JHMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMM vs. JHMD - Dividend Comparison
JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than JHMD's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 2.94% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 1.89% | 3.19% | 2.09% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMM and JHMD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHMD has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to JHMM (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs JHMD's -35.67%.
On 5-year performance, JHMD leads with 8.79% vs 8.57% for JHMM. On fees, JHMD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHMD has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.
JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.
JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while JHMD is Foreign Large Cap Equities. JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.39% for JHMD.
JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMM and JHMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer