JHMD vs. SCHF
JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - JHMD tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index while SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMD returned 8.79%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for SCHF. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JHMD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
JHMD vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 16.56% return.
JHMD
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 32.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
JHMD vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 8.43% | 33.91% | 1.78% | 19.43% | -13.95% | 11.83% | 7.25% | 19.83% | -14.54% | 25.02% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 16.56% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMD and SCHF is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.96 |
The correlation between JHMD and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHMD vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHMD
SCHF
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
JHMD
SCHF
Industrials
JHMD
SCHF
Healthcare
JHMD
SCHF
Basic Materials
JHMD
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
JHMD
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
JHMD
SCHF
Technology
JHMD
SCHF
Utilities
JHMD
SCHF
Communication Services
JHMD
SCHF
Energy
JHMD
SCHF
Real Estate
JHMD
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMD vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
JHMD
SCHF
JHMD vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMD | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.10 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 2.89 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.00 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 11.70 | -4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMD | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.10 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.63 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.44 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
JHMD vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMD | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -34.87% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -11.48% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -13.41% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -29.14% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | 0.00% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -7.38% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.95% | +0.05% |
Volatility
JHMD vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is 5.19%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that JHMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMD | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 5.73% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 13.32% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 15.75% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 16.38% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 17.19% | +0.01% |
JHMD vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMD vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, which matches SCHF's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 2.94% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 1.89% | 3.19% | 2.09% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.93% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, JHMD and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHF has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to JHMD (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 5-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.24% vs 8.79% for JHMD. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMD.
JHMD and SCHF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.94%.
JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMD and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer