PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMD vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMD vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 16.56% return.


JHMD

1D
0.29%
1M
1.60%
YTD
8.43%
6M
11.81%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*

SCHF

1D
0.54%
1M
5.58%
YTD
16.56%
6M
20.34%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMD vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
8.43%33.91%1.78%19.43%-13.95%11.83%7.25%19.83%-14.54%25.02%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
16.56%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMD and SCHF is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016

0.96

The correlation between JHMD and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMD vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMD
SCHF

Financial Services

24.8%
20.6%

Industrials

19.9%
11.5%

Healthcare

8.9%
6.5%

Basic Materials

7.8%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
4.9%

Technology

7.0%
15.7%

Utilities

5.7%
1.7%

Communication Services

5.3%
2.3%

Energy

4.0%
5.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.7%

Financial Services

JHMD
24.8%
SCHF
20.6%

Industrials

JHMD
19.9%
SCHF
11.5%

Healthcare

JHMD
8.9%
SCHF
6.5%

Basic Materials

JHMD
7.8%
SCHF
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMD
7.6%
SCHF
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

JHMD
7.4%
SCHF
4.9%

Technology

JHMD
7.0%
SCHF
15.7%

Utilities

JHMD
5.7%
SCHF
1.7%

Communication Services

JHMD
5.3%
SCHF
2.3%

Energy

JHMD
4.0%
SCHF
5.0%

Real Estate

JHMD
1.6%
SCHF
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMD vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMD
JHMD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JHMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMD vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMDSCHFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

2.10

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

2.89

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.00

-0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.56

11.70

-4.14

JHMD vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMD and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMDSCHFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

2.10

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.63

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.44

+0.11

Drawdowns

JHMD vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMDSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-34.87%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-11.48%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-13.41%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

-29.14%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

0.00%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-7.38%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.95%

+0.05%

Volatility

JHMD vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is 5.19%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that JHMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMDSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

5.73%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

13.32%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

15.75%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

16.38%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

17.19%

+0.01%

JHMD vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMD vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, which matches SCHF's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
2.94%3.19%3.55%3.01%2.85%3.22%1.89%3.19%2.09%2.27%0.00%0.00%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.93%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JHMD and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to JHMD (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 5-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.24% vs 8.79% for JHMD. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMD.

JHMD and SCHF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.94%.

JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMD and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer