JHMM vs. IJH
JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHMM returned 12.21%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for IJH. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JHMM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
JHMM vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 14.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JHMM having a 12.21% annualized return and IJH not far behind at 11.63%.
JHMM
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 23.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
IJH
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 14.64%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 25.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
JHMM vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 12.48% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 19.96% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.64% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMM and IJH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015 | 0.97 |
The correlation between JHMM and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHMM vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHMM
IJH
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
JHMM
IJH
Industrials
JHMM
IJH
Financial Services
JHMM
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
JHMM
IJH
Healthcare
JHMM
IJH
Real Estate
JHMM
IJH
Utilities
JHMM
IJH
Energy
JHMM
IJH
Basic Materials
JHMM
IJH
Consumer Defensive
JHMM
IJH
Communication Services
JHMM
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMM vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
JHMM
IJH
JHMM vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHMM | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.86 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | 10.44 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHMM vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMM | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -55.07% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -8.83% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.88% | -24.10% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -24.10% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.71% | -42.18% | +1.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -1.13% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -7.55% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.41% | -0.17% |
Volatility
JHMM vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 4.42%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMM | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 4.75% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.89% | 11.75% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 15.88% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 19.76% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 21.17% | -1.58% |
JHMM vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMM vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than IJH's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, JHMM and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJH has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to JHMM (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 12.21% vs 11.63% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 12.21% return vs 11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.
JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.05% for IJH.
JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMM and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer