PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMM vs. OTCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMM vs. OTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly higher than OTCAX's 5.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JHMM having a 12.21% annualized return and OTCAX not far ahead at 12.74%.


JHMM

1D
-0.78%
1M
1.45%
YTD
12.48%
6M
10.73%
1Y
23.57%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
12.21%

OTCAX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.21%
YTD
5.94%
6M
4.08%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. OTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
12.48%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%30.01%-9.57%19.96%
OTCAX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund
5.94%3.32%23.47%21.00%-28.53%13.66%35.34%37.43%0.82%25.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and OTCAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015

0.86

The correlation between JHMM and OTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMM vs. OTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

OTCAX
OTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
OTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. OTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHMMOTCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.06

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

0.28

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.54

0.71

+9.82

JHMM vs. OTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the OTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and OTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. OTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum OTCAX drawdown of -74.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and OTCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMMOTCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-74.39%

+33.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-16.46%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-21.05%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-36.85%

+12.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.71%

-36.85%

-3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-2.03%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-23.10%

+17.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

6.47%

-4.23%

Volatility

JHMM vs. OTCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 4.42%, while MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMMOTCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

6.02%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

14.16%

-3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

17.32%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.36%

20.30%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

20.03%

-0.44%

JHMM vs. OTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than OTCAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMM vs. OTCAX - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than OTCAX's 15.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%
OTCAX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund
15.82%16.76%15.59%0.00%0.00%3.64%0.83%0.86%4.70%8.80%5.67%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMM and OTCAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OTCAX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to JHMM (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs OTCAX's -74.39%.

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMM and OTCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer