JHMM vs. IMCG
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG).
JHMM and IMCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHMM is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. Both JHMM and IMCG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JHMM or IMCG.
Correlation
The correlation between JHMM and IMCG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JHMM vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JHMM:
1.64
IMCG:
1.78
JHMM:
2.27
IMCG:
2.41
JHMM:
1.29
IMCG:
1.30
JHMM:
2.93
IMCG:
1.67
JHMM:
7.48
IMCG:
8.24
JHMM:
3.06%
IMCG:
3.16%
JHMM:
13.98%
IMCG:
14.65%
JHMM:
-40.71%
IMCG:
-58.96%
JHMM:
-3.49%
IMCG:
-3.66%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly higher than IMCG's 3.67% return.
JHMM
4.07%
4.40%
10.82%
22.10%
10.30%
N/A
IMCG
3.67%
3.48%
14.76%
23.63%
12.01%
12.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHMM vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JHMM vs. IMCG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
JHMM
IMCG
JHMM vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JHMM vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than IMCG's 0.75% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.97% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.75% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% | 0.60% |
Drawdowns
JHMM vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and IMCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JHMM vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 5.14%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.