PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMD vs. JHSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMD vs. JHSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than JHSC's 11.55% return.


JHMD

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.80%
YTD
7.87%
6M
10.87%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*

JHSC

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.04%
YTD
11.55%
6M
10.59%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMD vs. JHSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
7.87%33.91%1.78%19.43%-13.95%11.83%7.25%19.83%-14.54%2.31%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
11.55%6.88%9.74%20.77%-14.65%19.55%11.60%24.43%-12.50%4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMD and JHSC is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.71

The correlation between JHMD and JHSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMD vs. JHSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMD
JHSC

Financial Services

24.8%
18.3%

Industrials

19.9%
16.8%

Healthcare

8.9%
7.4%

Basic Materials

7.8%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
3.4%

Technology

7.0%
14.1%

Utilities

5.7%
4.2%

Communication Services

5.3%
3.0%

Energy

4.0%
7.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
6.0%

Financial Services

JHMD
24.8%
JHSC
18.3%

Industrials

JHMD
19.9%
JHSC
16.8%

Healthcare

JHMD
8.9%
JHSC
7.4%

Basic Materials

JHMD
7.8%
JHSC
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMD
7.6%
JHSC
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

JHMD
7.4%
JHSC
3.4%

Technology

JHMD
7.0%
JHSC
14.1%

Utilities

JHMD
5.7%
JHSC
4.2%

Communication Services

JHMD
5.3%
JHSC
3.0%

Energy

JHMD
4.0%
JHSC
7.5%

Real Estate

JHMD
1.6%
JHSC
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMD vs. JHSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMD
JHMD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
JHMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

JHSC
JHSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JHSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JHSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMD vs. JHSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMDJHSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

1.49

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.22

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.51

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.21

8.69

-1.49

JHMD vs. JHSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the JHSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMD and JHSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMDJHSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.49

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.35

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.39

+0.15

Drawdowns

JHMD vs. JHSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum JHSC drawdown of -42.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and JHSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMDJHSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-42.66%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-9.63%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-25.16%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

-25.21%

-4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-0.80%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-7.78%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.78%

+0.22%

Volatility

JHMD vs. JHSC - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) at 4.16%. This indicates that JHMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMDJHSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

4.16%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

11.11%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

16.27%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

20.15%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

22.21%

-5.01%

JHMD vs. JHSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than JHSC's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMD vs. JHSC - Dividend Comparison

JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than JHSC's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
2.96%3.19%3.55%3.01%2.85%3.22%1.89%3.19%2.09%2.27%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.01%1.13%0.96%0.98%1.13%1.08%1.12%1.14%1.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMD and JHSC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHMD has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to JHSC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs JHSC's -42.66%.

On 5-year performance, JHMD leads with 8.47% vs 7.04% for JHSC. On fees, JHMD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHMD has performed better with a 8.47% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHMD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHSC.

JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.

JHMD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JHSC is Small Cap Growth Equities. JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.42% for JHSC.

JHSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMD and JHSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer