JHMD vs. FGRTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) and FGRTX (Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund) are both funds - JHMD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while FGRTX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, JHMD returned 8.79%/yr vs 16.31%/yr for FGRTX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHMD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FGRTX.

Performance

JHMD vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than FGRTX's 10.85% return.

JHMD

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 8.43%
• 6M: 11.81%
• 1Y: 21.14%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: —

FGRTX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 10.85%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 32.57%
• 3Y*: 25.72%
• 5Y*: 16.31%
• 10Y*: 16.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMD vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF	8.43%	33.91%	1.78%	19.43%	-13.95%	11.83%	7.25%	19.83%	-14.54%	25.02%
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	10.85%	26.92%	25.98%	26.51%	-8.98%	26.29%	12.96%	31.07%	-7.44%	16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMD and FGRTX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016	0.75

The correlation between JHMD and FGRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JHMD vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMD

JHMD Risk / Return Rank: 41
JHMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
JHMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
JHMD Omega Ratio Rank: 40
JHMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
JHMD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

FGRTX

FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMD vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHMD	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	2.81	-1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	3.83	-1.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.51	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	3.72	-1.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.56	16.91	-9.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHMD vs. FGRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the FGRTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMD and FGRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHMD	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	2.81	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.98	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.48	+0.07

Drawdowns

JHMD vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and FGRTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHMD	FGRTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.67%	-56.17%	+20.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.23%	-8.99%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.38%	-18.51%	+5.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.38%	-23.35%	-6.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.98%	0.00%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.73%	-8.72%	+1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	1.98%	+1.02%

Volatility

JHMD vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) at 2.69%. This indicates that JHMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHMD	FGRTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	2.69%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	9.06%	+2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.69%	12.00%	+2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.26%	16.70%	-0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	18.12%	-0.92%

JHMD vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRTX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHMD vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than FGRTX's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	3.51%	3.89%	2.68%	2.06%	4.38%	4.79%	7.96%	12.98%	21.72%	15.57%	1.97%	4.16%
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF	2.94%	3.19%	3.55%	3.01%	2.85%	3.22%	1.89%	3.19%	2.09%	2.27%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHMD and FGRTX in my portfolio?

JHMD and FGRTX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHMD or FGRTX?

JHMD has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to FGRTX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs FGRTX's -56.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.