JHMD vs. IDMO
JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMD returned 8.79%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for IDMO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHMD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
JHMD vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 9.00% return.
JHMD
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
IDMO
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 23.87%
- 3Y*
- 26.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
JHMD vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 8.43% | 33.91% | 1.78% | 19.43% | -13.95% | 11.83% | 7.25% | 19.83% | -14.54% | 25.02% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 9.00% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMD and IDMO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.77 |
The correlation between JHMD and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JHMD vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHMD
IDMO
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
JHMD
IDMO
Industrials
JHMD
IDMO
Healthcare
JHMD
IDMO
Basic Materials
JHMD
IDMO
Consumer Cyclical
JHMD
IDMO
Consumer Defensive
JHMD
IDMO
Technology
JHMD
IDMO
Utilities
JHMD
IDMO
Communication Services
JHMD
IDMO
Energy
JHMD
IDMO
Real Estate
JHMD
IDMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMD vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
JHMD
IDMO
JHMD vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 1.42 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 2.10 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 2.08 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 8.68 | -1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.42 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.91 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.46 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
JHMD vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -39.38% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -12.31% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -12.65% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -27.07% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -1.16% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -9.76% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.95% | +0.05% |
Volatility
JHMD vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is 5.19%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that JHMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 6.52% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 14.89% | -2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 16.89% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 17.84% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 18.11% | -0.91% |
JHMD vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMD vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than IDMO's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.49% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 2.94% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 1.89% | 3.19% | 2.09% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMD and IDMO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDMO has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to JHMD (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs IDMO's -39.38%.
On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 16.10% vs 8.79% for JHMD. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 16.10% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMD.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.94% for JHMD.
JHMD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.25% for IDMO.
JHMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMD and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer