PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMD vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMD vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 9.00% return.


JHMD

1D
0.29%
1M
1.60%
YTD
8.43%
6M
11.81%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*

IDMO

1D
0.95%
1M
1.79%
YTD
9.00%
6M
13.58%
1Y
23.87%
3Y*
26.19%
5Y*
16.10%
10Y*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMD vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
8.43%33.91%1.78%19.43%-13.95%11.83%7.25%19.83%-14.54%25.02%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
9.00%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMD and IDMO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016

0.77

The correlation between JHMD and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JHMD vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMD
IDMO

Financial Services

24.8%
42.4%

Industrials

19.9%
22.6%

Healthcare

8.9%
1.2%

Basic Materials

7.8%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
2.5%

Technology

7.0%
5.3%

Utilities

5.7%
8.4%

Communication Services

5.3%
2.2%

Energy

4.0%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.0%

Financial Services

JHMD
24.8%
IDMO
42.4%

Industrials

JHMD
19.9%
IDMO
22.6%

Healthcare

JHMD
8.9%
IDMO
1.2%

Basic Materials

JHMD
7.8%
IDMO
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMD
7.6%
IDMO
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

JHMD
7.4%
IDMO
2.5%

Technology

JHMD
7.0%
IDMO
5.3%

Utilities

JHMD
5.7%
IDMO
8.4%

Communication Services

JHMD
5.3%
IDMO
2.2%

Energy

JHMD
4.0%
IDMO
1.9%

Real Estate

JHMD
1.6%
IDMO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMD vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMD
JHMD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JHMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMD vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMDIDMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

1.42

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

2.10

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.08

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.56

8.68

-1.11

JHMD vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMD and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMDIDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.42

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.91

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.46

+0.09

Drawdowns

JHMD vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMDIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-39.38%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-12.31%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-12.65%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

-27.07%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-1.16%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-9.76%

+3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.95%

+0.05%

Volatility

JHMD vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is 5.19%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that JHMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMDIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

6.52%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

14.89%

-2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

16.89%

-2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

17.84%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

18.11%

-0.91%

JHMD vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMD vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than IDMO's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.49%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
2.94%3.19%3.55%3.01%2.85%3.22%1.89%3.19%2.09%2.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMD and IDMO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to JHMD (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 16.10% vs 8.79% for JHMD. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 16.10% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMD.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.94% for JHMD.

JHMD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.25% for IDMO.

JHMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMD and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer