PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMM vs. JPME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMM vs. JPME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly lower than JPME's 16.67% return. Over the past 10 years, JHMM has outperformed JPME with an annualized return of 11.70%, while JPME has yielded a comparatively lower 11.02% annualized return.


JHMM

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.44%
6M
8.72%
YTD
13.54%
1Y
21.81%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
11.70%
ALL TIME*
12.03%

JPME

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.81%
6M
11.90%
YTD
16.67%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
11.02%
ALL TIME*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.53M$15.46M$17.20M
$970.37K$1.56M$1.48M

JHMM vs. JPME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
13.54%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%30.01%-9.57%19.96%
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
16.67%8.26%13.55%11.28%-10.12%28.90%8.46%25.87%-8.92%19.09%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and JPME is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2016

0.95

The correlation between JHMM and JPME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMM vs. JPME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMM
JPME

Financial Services

20.1%
9.0%

Technology

18.1%
9.2%

Industrials

16.4%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
8.6%

Real Estate

8.1%
11.6%

Basic Materials

7.4%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
9.9%

Utilities

3.7%
10.1%

Energy

1.8%
7.6%

Communication Services

1.0%
3.5%

Financial Services

JHMM
20.1%
JPME
9.0%

Technology

JHMM
18.1%
JPME
9.2%

Industrials

JHMM
16.4%
JPME
9.4%

Healthcare

JHMM
8.5%
JPME
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMM
8.3%
JPME
8.6%

Real Estate

JHMM
8.1%
JPME
11.6%

Basic Materials

JHMM
7.4%
JPME
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

JHMM
6.1%
JPME
9.9%

Utilities

JHMM
3.7%
JPME
10.1%

Energy

JHMM
1.8%
JPME
7.6%

Communication Services

JHMM
1.0%
JPME
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMM vs. JPME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

JPME
JPME Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
JPME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPME Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JPME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPME Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHMM vs. JPME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHMMJPMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.37

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

12.90

-3.92

JHMM vs. JPME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the JPME Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and JPME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. JPME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, roughly equal to the maximum JPME drawdown of -41.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and JPME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMMJPMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-41.01%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-6.84%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-18.70%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-19.30%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.71%

-41.01%

+0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.11%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-4.33%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.78%

+0.46%

Volatility

JHMM vs. JPME - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) at 2.67%. This indicates that JHMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMMJPMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.67%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

8.52%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.33%

11.87%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.30%

16.07%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.54%

17.63%

+1.91%

JHMM vs. JPME - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than JPME's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMM vs. JPME - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than JPME's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.89%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.74%2.03%1.77%1.84%1.84%1.44%1.51%1.68%1.80%1.17%0.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JHMM and JPME move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JHMM has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to JPME (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs JPME's -41.01%.

On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.70% vs 11.02% for JPME. On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPME has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.

JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.89% for JHMM.

JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while JPME is Mid Cap Blend Equities. JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.24% for JPME.

JPME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMM and JPME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer