PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMD vs. JHML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMD vs. JHML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JHMD having a 11.49% return and JHML slightly higher at 11.94%.


JHMD

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.36%
6M
6.05%
YTD
11.49%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.59%

JHML

1D
0.45%
1M
0.15%
6M
9.36%
YTD
11.94%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
13.91%
ALL TIME*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.34M$3.95M$4.42M
$3.30M$3.14M$2.58M

JHMD vs. JHML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
11.49%33.91%1.78%19.43%-13.95%11.83%7.25%19.83%-14.54%25.02%
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
11.94%15.91%19.84%21.16%-15.94%26.90%17.02%30.94%-6.45%21.52%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMD and JHML is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016

0.75

The correlation between JHMD and JHML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMD vs. JHML - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMD
JHML

Financial Services

25.7%
13.6%

Industrials

19.3%
12.3%

Healthcare

9.1%
9.3%

Technology

8.9%
30.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
9.7%

Basic Materials

7.4%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
4.7%

Utilities

5.3%
3.7%

Communication Services

4.9%
7.4%

Energy

3.3%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.3%

Financial Services

JHMD
25.7%
JHML
13.6%

Industrials

JHMD
19.3%
JHML
12.3%

Healthcare

JHMD
9.1%
JHML
9.3%

Technology

JHMD
8.9%
JHML
30.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMD
7.4%
JHML
9.7%

Basic Materials

JHMD
7.4%
JHML
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

JHMD
7.3%
JHML
4.7%

Utilities

JHMD
5.3%
JHML
3.7%

Communication Services

JHMD
4.9%
JHML
7.4%

Energy

JHMD
3.3%
JHML
3.7%

Real Estate

JHMD
1.4%
JHML
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMD vs. JHML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHMD
JHMD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JHMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

JHML
JHML Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JHML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHML Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JHML Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHML Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHMD vs. JHML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHMDJHMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.58

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

11.62

-3.50

JHMD vs. JHML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the JHML Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMD and JHML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHMD vs. JHML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, roughly equal to the maximum JHML drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and JHML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMDJHMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-36.13%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-7.95%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-18.20%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

-23.47%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.67%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-4.25%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.76%

+1.27%

Volatility

JHMD vs. JHML - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) at 2.94%. This indicates that JHMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMDJHMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

2.94%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

9.41%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.21%

12.10%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

16.33%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

17.74%

-0.56%

JHMD vs. JHML - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JHML's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMD vs. JHML - Dividend Comparison

JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than JHML's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
2.99%3.19%3.55%3.01%2.85%3.22%1.89%3.19%2.09%2.27%0.00%0.00%
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
0.96%1.06%1.16%1.39%1.46%1.08%1.59%1.73%1.57%1.44%1.36%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMD and JHML have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHMD has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to JHML (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs JHML's -36.13%.

On 5-year performance, JHML leads with 11.27% vs 9.41% for JHMD. On fees, JHML is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHML has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHML has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHML is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMD.

JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 0.96% for JHML.

JHMD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JHML is Large Cap Growth Equities. JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while JHML tracks John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.29% for JHML.

JHML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMD and JHML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer