JHMD vs. JHMM
JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) and JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMD returned 8.47%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for JHMM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHMD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHMM.
Performance
JHMD vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 12.60% return.
JHMD
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- —
JHMM
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
JHMD vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 7.87% | 33.91% | 1.78% | 19.43% | -13.95% | 11.83% | 7.25% | 19.83% | -14.54% | 25.02% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 12.60% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 19.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMD and JHMM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.73 |
The correlation between JHMD and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHMD vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHMD
JHMM
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
JHMD
JHMM
Industrials
JHMD
JHMM
Healthcare
JHMD
JHMM
Basic Materials
JHMD
JHMM
Consumer Cyclical
JHMD
JHMM
Consumer Defensive
JHMD
JHMM
Technology
JHMD
JHMM
Utilities
JHMD
JHMM
Communication Services
JHMD
JHMM
Energy
JHMD
JHMM
Real Estate
JHMD
JHMM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMD vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank
JHMD
JHMM
JHMD vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMD | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.89 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 11.17 | -3.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMD | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.77 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.46 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.63 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
JHMD vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum JHMM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and JHMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMD | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -40.71% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -8.64% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -21.88% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -24.10% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -0.24% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -5.43% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.23% | +0.77% |
Volatility
JHMD vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 3.81%. This indicates that JHMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMD | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 3.81% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 10.47% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 14.12% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 18.32% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 19.60% | -2.40% |
JHMD vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMD vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison
JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than JHMM's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 2.96% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 1.89% | 3.19% | 2.09% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMD and JHMM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHMD has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to JHMM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs JHMM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, JHMD leads with 8.47% vs 8.39% for JHMM. On fees, JHMD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHMD has performed better with a 8.47% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.
JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.
JHMD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JHMM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.42% for JHMM.
JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMD and JHMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer