IFV vs. FDL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IFV (First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IFV returned 7.10%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for FDL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFV charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.

Performance

IFV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IFV having a 12.94% return and FDL slightly higher at 13.33%. Over the past 10 years, IFV has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 7.10%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.

IFV

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 6M: 16.30%
• 1Y: 29.74%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 7.10%

FDL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF	12.94%	32.26%	0.33%	20.45%	-25.39%	5.59%	6.15%	26.29%	-20.44%	32.58%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	13.33%	14.79%	17.98%	2.94%	6.66%	26.10%	-4.30%	24.41%	-5.99%	12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IFV and FDL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between IFV and FDL has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IFV vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFV	FDL
Industrials	31.1%	3.8%
Financial Services	11.6%	15.1%
Basic Materials	10.3%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	3.8%
Energy	8.5%	27.3%
Technology	7.5%	1.1%
Real Estate	6.1%	-
Utilities	5.4%	6.5%
Healthcare	4.0%	16.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	14.7%
Communication Services	2.6%	10.6%

Return for Risk

IFV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFV

IFV Risk / Return Rank: 53
IFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IFV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
IFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IFV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IFV	FDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.11	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	3.25	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	5.56	-3.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	13.56	-4.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IFV vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFV and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFV	FDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.11	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.88	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.66	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.45	-0.21

Drawdowns

IFV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and FDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFV	FDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.89%	-65.93%	+17.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.57%	-4.27%	-8.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.66%	-12.24%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.32%	-16.46%	-18.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.89%	-41.40%	-7.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-2.18%	+0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.23%	-9.66%	-3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	1.75%	+1.57%

Volatility

IFV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that IFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IFV	FDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.06%	2.85%	+3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.47%	7.87%	+5.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.24%	11.28%	+4.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.97%	14.31%	+3.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.75%	17.11%	+3.64%

IFV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.68%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF	1.76%	1.95%	2.31%	2.88%	3.79%	1.04%	1.53%	2.91%	1.86%	1.43%	1.10%	1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFV and FDL in my portfolio?

IFV and FDL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IFV or FDL?

IFV has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs FDL's -65.93%.

Which ETF is better, IFV or FDL?

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.24% vs 7.10% for IFV. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IFV or FDL?

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFV or FDL?

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFV or FDL?

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.76% for IFV.

What is the main difference between IFV and FDL?

IFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.45% for FDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.