IFV vs. SCHF
IFV (First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IFV tracks the Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index while SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IFV returned 7.79%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IFV charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
IFV vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IFV has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 7.79%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.18% annualized return.
IFV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 6M
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- 29.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
IFV vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 12.31% | 32.26% | 0.33% | 20.45% | -25.39% | 5.59% | 6.15% | 26.29% | -20.44% | 32.58% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 17.68% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFV and SCHF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2014 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IFV and SCHF shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (5 years) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IFV vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFV
SCHF
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
IFV
SCHF
Financial Services
IFV
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
IFV
SCHF
Basic Materials
IFV
SCHF
Technology
IFV
SCHF
Energy
IFV
SCHF
Real Estate
IFV
SCHF
Utilities
IFV
SCHF
Healthcare
IFV
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
IFV
SCHF
Communication Services
IFV
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFV vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
IFV
SCHF
IFV vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 3.18 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 12.22 | -3.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFV vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -34.87% | -14.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -11.48% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.66% | -13.41% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.78% | -29.14% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.89% | -34.87% | -14.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | 0.00% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.19% | -7.36% | -5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.98% | +0.42% |
Volatility
IFV vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 6.47% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 6.42% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 14.43% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 16.63% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 16.55% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 17.21% | +3.55% |
IFV vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFV vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 1.77% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 2.88% | 3.79% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 2.91% | 1.86% | 1.43% | 1.10% | 1.52% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.90% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFV and SCHF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFV has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to SCHF (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 11.18% vs 7.79% for IFV. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.77% for IFV.
IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFV and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer