IFV vs. VEA
IFV (First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IFV tracks the Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index while VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IFV returned 7.79%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IFV charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
IFV vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 16.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IFV has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 7.79%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.
IFV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 6M
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- 29.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
VEA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 35.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
IFV vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 12.31% | 32.26% | 0.33% | 20.45% | -25.39% | 5.59% | 6.15% | 26.29% | -20.44% | 32.58% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 16.69% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFV and VEA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2014 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IFV and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (5 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IFV vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFV
VEA
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
IFV
VEA
Financial Services
IFV
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
IFV
VEA
Basic Materials
IFV
VEA
Technology
IFV
VEA
Energy
IFV
VEA
Real Estate
IFV
VEA
Utilities
IFV
VEA
Healthcare
IFV
VEA
Consumer Defensive
IFV
VEA
Communication Services
IFV
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFV vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
IFV
VEA
IFV vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 3.06 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 11.80 | -3.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFV vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -60.68% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -11.63% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.66% | -13.45% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.78% | -29.71% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.89% | -35.73% | -13.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | 0.00% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.19% | -13.26% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.01% | +0.39% |
Volatility
IFV vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 6.47% and 6.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFV | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 6.32% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 14.39% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 16.52% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 16.71% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 17.38% | +3.38% |
IFV vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFV vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than VEA's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 1.77% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 2.88% | 3.79% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 2.91% | 1.86% | 1.43% | 1.10% | 1.52% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.50% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFV and VEA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFV has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to VEA (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 11.06% vs 7.79% for IFV. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.77% for IFV.
IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFV and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer