PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFV vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFV vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 16.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IFV has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 7.79%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.


IFV

1D
0.45%
1M
0.98%
YTD
12.31%
6M
12.51%
1Y
29.49%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
7.79%

VEA

1D
0.11%
1M
3.28%
YTD
16.69%
6M
17.33%
1Y
35.42%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFV vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
12.31%32.26%0.33%20.45%-25.39%5.59%6.15%26.29%-20.44%32.58%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.69%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IFV and VEA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2014

0.82

The correlation between IFV and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (5 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IFV vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFV
VEA

Industrials

30.7%
17.5%

Financial Services

11.2%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
7.4%

Basic Materials

9.8%
7.5%

Technology

9.5%
16.6%

Energy

7.8%
4.7%

Real Estate

5.8%
2.5%

Utilities

5.1%
3.0%

Healthcare

3.9%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.2%

Industrials

IFV
30.7%
VEA
17.5%

Financial Services

IFV
11.2%
VEA
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IFV
10.0%
VEA
7.4%

Basic Materials

IFV
9.8%
VEA
7.5%

Technology

IFV
9.5%
VEA
16.6%

Energy

IFV
7.8%
VEA
4.7%

Real Estate

IFV
5.8%
VEA
2.5%

Utilities

IFV
5.1%
VEA
3.0%

Healthcare

IFV
3.9%
VEA
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

IFV
3.7%
VEA
5.5%

Communication Services

IFV
2.5%
VEA
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFV vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFV
IFV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFV vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFVVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

3.06

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

11.80

-3.09

IFV vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFV and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFV vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFVVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-60.68%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-11.63%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-13.45%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.78%

-29.71%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-35.73%

-13.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

0.00%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.19%

-13.26%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

3.01%

+0.39%

Volatility

IFV vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 6.47% and 6.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFVVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

6.32%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

14.39%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

16.52%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.12%

16.71%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

17.38%

+3.38%

IFV vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFV vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than VEA's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
1.77%1.95%2.31%2.88%3.79%1.04%1.53%2.91%1.86%1.43%1.10%1.52%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.50%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFV and VEA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFV has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to VEA (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 11.06% vs 7.79% for IFV. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.77% for IFV.

IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFV and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer