FDL vs. SCHD
FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDL returned 11.16%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDL charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FDL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.16%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.
FDL
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 19.60%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 25.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
FDL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 14.24% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 26.10% | -4.30% | 24.41% | -5.99% | 12.02% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.60% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDL and SCHD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FDL and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDL vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDL
SCHD
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
FDL
SCHD
Healthcare
FDL
SCHD
Financial Services
FDL
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FDL
SCHD
Communication Services
FDL
SCHD
Utilities
FDL
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FDL
SCHD
Industrials
FDL
SCHD
Technology
FDL
SCHD
Basic Materials
FDL
SCHD
Real Estate
FDL
-
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FDL
SCHD
FDL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 5.55 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | 13.67 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.93% | -33.37% | -32.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -4.61% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.24% | -16.13% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.46% | -16.85% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.40% | -33.37% | -8.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -0.91% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -3.31% | -6.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.88% | -0.13% |
Volatility
FDL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.15%. This indicates that FDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.15% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 7.57% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.38% | 10.93% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 14.39% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 16.72% | +0.40% |
FDL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDL has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than SCHD's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.65% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.25% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDL has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to SCHD (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.80% vs 11.16% for FDL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 11.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 3.25% for SCHD.
FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FDL and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDL and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer