PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFV vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IFV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.29%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


IFV

1D
-0.10%
1M
-4.58%
6M
-3.93%
YTD
2.96%
1Y
13.49%
3Y*
13.09%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
6.29%
ALL TIME*
3.98%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$917.19K$1.79M$1.48M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

IFV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
2.96%32.26%0.33%20.45%-25.39%5.59%6.15%26.29%-20.44%32.58%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IFV and VOO is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2014

0.66

The correlation between IFV and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IFV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFV
VOO

Industrials

29.7%
8.5%

Technology

16.2%
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
9.5%

Financial Services

9.1%
11.4%

Basic Materials

7.4%
1.7%

Healthcare

5.7%
8.9%

Energy

5.6%
3.0%

Real Estate

5.4%
1.8%

Utilities

4.6%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.5%

Communication Services

2.3%
9.9%

Industrials

IFV
29.7%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

IFV
16.2%
VOO
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IFV
9.7%
VOO
9.5%

Financial Services

IFV
9.1%
VOO
11.4%

Basic Materials

IFV
7.4%
VOO
1.7%

Healthcare

IFV
5.7%
VOO
8.9%

Energy

IFV
5.6%
VOO
3.0%

Real Estate

IFV
5.4%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

IFV
4.6%
VOO
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

IFV
4.3%
VOO
4.5%

Communication Services

IFV
2.3%
VOO
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IFV
IFV Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IFV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFVVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.28

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

2.21

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

9.44

-6.64

IFV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFV Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFV and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFVVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-33.99%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-8.90%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-18.69%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.00%

-24.52%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-33.99%

-14.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.04%

-1.38%

-8.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.14%

-3.67%

-9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

2.08%

+2.32%

Volatility

IFV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that IFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFVVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

3.54%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.96%

10.10%

+5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

12.82%

+5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

16.93%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

18.01%

+2.59%

IFV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
1.89%1.95%2.31%2.88%3.79%1.04%1.53%2.91%1.86%1.43%1.10%1.52%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFV and VOO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFV has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.14% vs 6.29% for IFV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.

IFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

IFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFV and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer