PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDL vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDL vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPYD's 16.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FDL has outperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 11.09%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.


FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%

SPYD

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.23%
6M
11.71%
YTD
16.95%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
8.85%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M
$48.08M$45.65M$55.32M

FDL vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.16%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
16.95%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and SPYD is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2015

0.88

The correlation between FDL and SPYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDL vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDL
SPYD

Consumer Defensive

24.3%
14.6%

Utilities

15.4%
11.6%

Financial Services

13.7%
12.6%

Healthcare

11.7%
5.4%

Communication Services

11.2%
4.6%

Energy

11.1%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
6.4%

Technology

4.3%
2.7%

Industrials

3.6%
2.5%

Basic Materials

0.4%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

26.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDL
24.3%
SPYD
14.6%

Utilities

FDL
15.4%
SPYD
11.6%

Financial Services

FDL
13.7%
SPYD
12.6%

Healthcare

FDL
11.7%
SPYD
5.4%

Communication Services

FDL
11.2%
SPYD
4.6%

Energy

FDL
11.1%
SPYD
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FDL
4.4%
SPYD
6.4%

Technology

FDL
4.3%
SPYD
2.7%

Industrials

FDL
3.6%
SPYD
2.5%

Basic Materials

FDL
0.4%
SPYD
3.7%

Real Estate

FDL

-

SPYD
26.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDL vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDL vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLSPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.29

3.01

+3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

8.94

+5.92

FDL vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDL vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than SPYD's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.93%

-46.42%

-19.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-7.05%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-16.13%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

-22.25%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

-46.42%

+5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-2.06%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-6.09%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.37%

-0.56%

Volatility

FDL vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 4.00%. This indicates that FDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

4.00%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

8.41%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

11.94%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

15.98%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

19.77%

-2.61%

FDL vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDL vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than SPYD's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.10%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDL and SPYD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to SPYD (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.09% vs 8.85% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 3.59% for FDL.

FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FDL and 0.07% for SPYD.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDL and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer