IFV vs. SCHD
IFV (First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IFV returned 7.79%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SCHD. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFV charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
IFV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return. Over the past 10 years, IFV has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.79%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.
IFV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 6M
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- 29.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 24.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
IFV vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 12.31% | 32.26% | 0.33% | 20.45% | -25.39% | 5.59% | 6.15% | 26.29% | -20.44% | 32.58% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.24% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFV and SCHD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2014 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IFV and SCHD has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IFV vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFV
SCHD
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
IFV
SCHD
Financial Services
IFV
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
IFV
SCHD
Basic Materials
IFV
SCHD
Technology
IFV
SCHD
Energy
IFV
SCHD
Real Estate
IFV
SCHD
-
Utilities
IFV
SCHD
Healthcare
IFV
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
IFV
SCHD
Communication Services
IFV
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFV vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
IFV
SCHD
IFV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 5.24 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 12.71 | -4.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -33.37% | -15.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -4.61% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.66% | -16.13% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.78% | -16.85% | -17.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.89% | -33.37% | -15.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -2.86% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.19% | -3.31% | -9.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 1.90% | +1.50% |
Volatility
IFV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that IFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 3.58% | +2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 7.74% | +6.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 11.09% | +5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 14.36% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 16.73% | +4.03% |
IFV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 1.77% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 2.88% | 3.79% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 2.91% | 1.86% | 1.43% | 1.10% | 1.52% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFV and SCHD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFV has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.68% vs 7.79% for IFV. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.77% for IFV.
IFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFV and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer