PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.09%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

FDL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.16%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and VOO is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and VOO has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDL
VOO

Consumer Defensive

24.3%
4.5%

Utilities

15.4%
2.2%

Financial Services

13.7%
11.4%

Healthcare

11.7%
8.9%

Communication Services

11.2%
9.9%

Energy

11.1%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
9.5%

Technology

4.3%
38.6%

Industrials

3.6%
8.5%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.7%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDL
24.3%
VOO
4.5%

Utilities

FDL
15.4%
VOO
2.2%

Financial Services

FDL
13.7%
VOO
11.4%

Healthcare

FDL
11.7%
VOO
8.9%

Communication Services

FDL
11.2%
VOO
9.9%

Energy

FDL
11.1%
VOO
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FDL
4.4%
VOO
9.5%

Technology

FDL
4.3%
VOO
38.6%

Industrials

FDL
3.6%
VOO
8.5%

Basic Materials

FDL
0.4%
VOO
1.7%

Real Estate

FDL

-

VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.29

2.21

+4.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

9.44

+5.42

FDL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.93%

-33.99%

-31.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-8.90%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-18.69%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

-24.52%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

-33.99%

-7.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-1.38%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-3.67%

-5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.08%

-0.27%

Volatility

FDL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that FDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

3.54%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

10.10%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

12.82%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

16.93%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

18.01%

-0.85%

FDL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDL and VOO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.14% vs 11.09% for FDL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FDL and 0.03% for VOO.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer