PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDL vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDL vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDL having a 11.33% return and VYM slightly higher at 11.70%. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.99%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.


FDL

1D
-0.16%
1M
-3.91%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.38%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
10.99%

VYM

1D
0.11%
1M
0.42%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.13%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDL vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
11.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
11.70%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and VYM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and VYM has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDL vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDL
VYM

Energy

25.7%
9.1%

Healthcare

17.6%
12.2%

Financial Services

15.2%
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

14.4%
8.0%

Communication Services

10.6%
3.4%

Utilities

6.5%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
6.6%

Industrials

3.9%
11.8%

Technology

1.4%
20.3%

Basic Materials

0.3%
3.4%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Energy

FDL
25.7%
VYM
9.1%

Healthcare

FDL
17.6%
VYM
12.2%

Financial Services

FDL
15.2%
VYM
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

FDL
14.4%
VYM
8.0%

Communication Services

FDL
10.6%
VYM
3.4%

Utilities

FDL
6.5%
VYM
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDL
4.7%
VYM
6.6%

Industrials

FDL
3.9%
VYM
11.8%

Technology

FDL
1.4%
VYM
20.3%

Basic Materials

FDL
0.3%
VYM
3.4%

Real Estate

FDL

-

VYM
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDL vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDL vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.94

3.79

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

14.09

-2.39

FDL vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDL vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.93%

-56.98%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-6.69%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-14.46%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

-15.84%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

-35.21%

-6.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-1.12%

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-7.18%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.80%

0.00%

Volatility

FDL vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.02%. This indicates that FDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

3.02%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.03%

7.64%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.51%

10.41%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

13.93%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

16.35%

+0.78%

FDL vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDL vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than VYM's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.74%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.29%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDL and VYM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to VYM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 12.00% vs 10.99% for FDL. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.29% for VYM.

FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FDL and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDL and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer