FDL vs. VYM
FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDL returned 10.99%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for VYM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDL charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
FDL vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDL having a 11.33% return and VYM slightly higher at 11.70%. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.99%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.
FDL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
VYM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
FDL vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 11.33% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 26.10% | -4.30% | 24.41% | -5.99% | 12.02% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 11.70% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDL and VYM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and VYM has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDL vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDL
VYM
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Energy
FDL
VYM
Healthcare
FDL
VYM
Financial Services
FDL
VYM
Consumer Defensive
FDL
VYM
Communication Services
FDL
VYM
Utilities
FDL
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
FDL
VYM
Industrials
FDL
VYM
Technology
FDL
VYM
Basic Materials
FDL
VYM
Real Estate
FDL
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDL vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
FDL
VYM
FDL vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDL | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.94 | 3.79 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | 14.09 | -2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDL vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDL | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.93% | -56.98% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -6.69% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.24% | -14.46% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.46% | -15.84% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.40% | -35.21% | -6.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -1.12% | -3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -7.18% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 1.80% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FDL vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.02%. This indicates that FDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDL | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 3.02% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 7.64% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.51% | 10.41% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 13.93% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 16.35% | +0.78% |
FDL vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDL has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDL vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than VYM's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.74% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDL and VYM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDL has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to VYM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 12.00% vs 10.99% for FDL. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.29% for VYM.
FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FDL and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDL and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer