PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFV vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFV vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, IFV has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 7.10%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


IFV

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.11%
YTD
12.94%
6M
16.30%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
7.10%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFV vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
12.94%32.26%0.33%20.45%-25.39%5.59%6.15%26.29%-20.44%32.58%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IFV and IVV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014

0.66

The correlation between IFV and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IFV vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFV
IVV

Industrials

31.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.8%

Basic Materials

10.3%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.1%

Energy

8.5%
3.5%

Technology

7.5%
35.6%

Real Estate

6.1%
1.9%

Utilities

5.4%
2.4%

Healthcare

4.0%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
11.2%

Industrials

IFV
31.1%
IVV
8.3%

Financial Services

IFV
11.6%
IVV
11.8%

Basic Materials

IFV
10.3%
IVV
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IFV
9.3%
IVV
10.1%

Energy

IFV
8.5%
IVV
3.5%

Technology

IFV
7.5%
IVV
35.6%

Real Estate

IFV
6.1%
IVV
1.9%

Utilities

IFV
5.4%
IVV
2.4%

Healthcare

IFV
4.0%
IVV
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

IFV
3.9%
IVV
4.9%

Communication Services

IFV
2.6%
IVV
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFV vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFV
IFV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFV vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFVIVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.39

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

3.25

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.17

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.97

14.71

-5.74

IFV vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFV and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFVIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.39

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.83

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.86

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.45

-0.21

Drawdowns

IFV vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFVIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-55.25%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-8.89%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-18.75%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.32%

-24.53%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-33.90%

-14.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-0.76%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-10.78%

-2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

1.91%

+1.41%

Volatility

IFV vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that IFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFVIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

2.87%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

8.90%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

11.80%

+4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

16.88%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

18.05%

+2.70%

IFV vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFV vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
1.76%1.95%2.31%2.88%3.79%1.04%1.53%2.91%1.86%1.43%1.10%1.52%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFV and IVV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFV has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 7.10% for IFV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.

IFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

IFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFV and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer