PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSJY vs. GSEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSJY vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than GSEW's 9.52% return.


GSJY

1D
0.75%
1M
4.99%
YTD
13.29%
6M
15.13%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
9.28%

GSEW

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.19%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.82%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSJY vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
13.29%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%8.86%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
9.52%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and GSEW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017

0.64

The correlation between GSJY and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSJY vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSJY
GSEW

Industrials

26.3%
15.6%

Financial Services

18.1%
14.3%

Technology

17.5%
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
9.1%

Communication Services

6.0%
3.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
11.3%

Energy

3.4%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.4%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
5.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
4.0%

Utilities

1.4%
5.8%

Industrials

GSJY
26.3%
GSEW
15.6%

Financial Services

GSJY
18.1%
GSEW
14.3%

Technology

GSJY
17.5%
GSEW
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GSJY
13.4%
GSEW
9.1%

Communication Services

GSJY
6.0%
GSEW
3.5%

Healthcare

GSJY
5.8%
GSEW
11.3%

Energy

GSJY
3.4%
GSEW
4.9%

Basic Materials

GSJY
3.4%
GSEW
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

GSJY
3.3%
GSEW
5.7%

Real Estate

GSJY
1.5%
GSEW
4.0%

Utilities

GSJY
1.4%
GSEW
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSJY vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSJY vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSJYGSEWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.45

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

9.35

-2.26

GSJY vs. GSEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the GSEW Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and GSEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSJYGSEWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.56

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.61

-0.07

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and GSEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSJYGSEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-38.65%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-7.72%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-18.18%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

-25.74%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-0.66%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-5.89%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

2.02%

+2.19%

Volatility

GSJY vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.76%. This indicates that GSJY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSJYGSEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

2.76%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.17%

9.05%

+6.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

12.12%

+7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

16.91%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

19.20%

-2.16%

GSJY vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSJY vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than GSEW's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.42%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
1.75%1.99%1.64%2.11%2.13%1.73%1.22%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSJY and GSEW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSJY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs GSEW's -38.65%.

On 5-year performance, GSJY leads with 8.80% vs 8.63% for GSEW. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 8.80% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSJY.

GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.42% for GSEW.

GSJY is categorized as Japan Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.09% for GSEW.

GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSJY and GSEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer