GSJY vs. GSEW
GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) and GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSJY is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while GSEW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSJY returned 8.80%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for GSEW. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSJY charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSEW.
Performance
GSJY vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than GSEW's 9.52% return.
GSJY
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
GSEW
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- —
GSJY vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 13.29% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 8.86% |
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 9.52% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 25.43% | 16.28% | 31.04% | -8.11% | 7.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSJY and GSEW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GSJY and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSJY vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSJY
GSEW
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
GSJY
GSEW
Financial Services
GSJY
GSEW
Technology
GSJY
GSEW
Consumer Cyclical
GSJY
GSEW
Communication Services
GSJY
GSEW
Healthcare
GSJY
GSEW
Energy
GSJY
GSEW
Basic Materials
GSJY
GSEW
Consumer Defensive
GSJY
GSEW
Real Estate
GSJY
GSEW
Utilities
GSJY
GSEW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSJY vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank
GSJY
GSEW
GSJY vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSJY | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.45 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 9.35 | -2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSJY | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.56 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.51 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.61 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
GSJY vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and GSEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSJY | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -38.65% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -7.72% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -18.18% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.53% | -25.74% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -0.66% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -5.89% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 2.02% | +2.19% |
Volatility
GSJY vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.76%. This indicates that GSJY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSJY | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 2.76% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.17% | 9.05% | +6.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 12.12% | +7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 16.91% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 19.20% | -2.16% |
GSJY vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSJY vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison
GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than GSEW's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.42% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.75% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSJY and GSEW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSJY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs GSEW's -38.65%.
On 5-year performance, GSJY leads with 8.80% vs 8.63% for GSEW. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 8.80% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSJY.
GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.42% for GSEW.
GSJY is categorized as Japan Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.09% for GSEW.
GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSJY and GSEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer