PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSJY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSJY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, GSJY has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 9.36%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


GSJY

1D
-3.94%
1M
1.06%
YTD
12.58%
6M
11.90%
1Y
31.84%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
9.36%

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSJY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
12.58%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%25.50%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and ^GSPC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016

0.62

The correlation between GSJY and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSJY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSJY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSJY^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.46

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

10.92

-3.48

GSJY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSJY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-56.78%

+24.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-9.10%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-18.90%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

-25.43%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-33.92%

+1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-3.21%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-10.71%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

2.04%

+2.25%

Volatility

GSJY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.89%. This indicates that GSJY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSJY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

4.89%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

9.93%

+6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.44%

12.57%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

17.00%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

18.08%

-0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSJY and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSJY has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to ^GSPC (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSJY and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer