PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSJY vs. DXJS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSJY vs. DXJS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GSJY

1D
-1.73%
1M
1.03%
6M
6.67%
YTD
12.95%
1Y
31.55%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
9.08%

DXJS

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSJY vs. DXJS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
12.95%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%25.50%
DXJS
WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund
23.30%37.08%20.70%38.96%5.02%11.66%-3.22%18.24%-18.69%29.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and DXJS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016

0.69

The correlation between GSJY and DXJS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSJY vs. DXJS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSJY vs. DXJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSJYDXJSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

GSJY vs. DXJS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. DXJS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSJYDXJSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

Volatility

GSJY vs. DXJS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSJYDXJSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

GSJY vs. DXJS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSJY vs. DXJS - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, while DXJS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJS
WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund
0.53%1.78%4.02%2.71%2.63%2.96%3.04%2.17%2.06%1.53%1.66%3.61%
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
2.05%1.99%1.64%2.11%2.13%1.73%1.22%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSJY and DXJS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DXJS.

GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.53% for DXJS.

GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while DXJS tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.58% for DXJS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSJY and DXJS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer