PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GSJY vs. JPM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and JPM is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

GSJY vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.44%
22.58%
GSJY
JPM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GSJY:

0.18

JPM:

2.32

Sortino Ratio

GSJY:

0.36

JPM:

3.08

Omega Ratio

GSJY:

1.05

JPM:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

GSJY:

0.27

JPM:

5.41

Martin Ratio

GSJY:

0.71

JPM:

15.46

Ulcer Index

GSJY:

4.43%

JPM:

3.55%

Daily Std Dev

GSJY:

17.53%

JPM:

23.66%

Max Drawdown

GSJY:

-32.53%

JPM:

-74.02%

Current Drawdown

GSJY:

-8.18%

JPM:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than JPM's 6.62% return.


GSJY

YTD

-2.40%

1M

-3.25%

6M

-4.09%

1Y

4.24%

5Y*

3.78%

10Y*

N/A

JPM

YTD

6.62%

1M

7.23%

6M

22.46%

1Y

55.65%

5Y*

16.31%

10Y*

19.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GSJY vs. JPM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GSJY is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GSJY is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GSJY is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GSJY is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GSJY is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GSJY is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JPM is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JPM is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JPM is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JPM is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JPM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JPM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GSJY vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GSJY, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.182.32
The chart of Sortino ratio for GSJY, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.363.08
The chart of Omega ratio for GSJY, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.051.46
The chart of Calmar ratio for GSJY, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.275.41
The chart of Martin ratio for GSJY, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.7115.46
GSJY
JPM

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and JPM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.18
2.32
GSJY
JPM

Dividends

GSJY vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than JPM's 1.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
1.68%1.64%2.12%2.13%1.73%1.12%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%0.00%0.00%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.89%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%2.49%

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum JPM drawdown of -74.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and JPM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-8.18%
0
GSJY
JPM

Volatility

GSJY vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) is 4.71%, while JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that GSJY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.71%
5.93%
GSJY
JPM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab