GSEW vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
GSEW and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSEW is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both GSEW and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSEW or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between GSEW and SCHG is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSEW vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSEW:
1.69
SCHG:
2.22
GSEW:
2.36
SCHG:
2.86
GSEW:
1.30
SCHG:
1.40
GSEW:
2.84
SCHG:
3.13
GSEW:
9.75
SCHG:
12.34
GSEW:
2.06%
SCHG:
3.14%
GSEW:
11.88%
SCHG:
17.45%
GSEW:
-38.65%
SCHG:
-34.59%
GSEW:
-5.71%
SCHG:
-2.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 17.62% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 37.04% return.
GSEW
17.62%
-2.73%
9.82%
18.62%
10.79%
N/A
SCHG
37.04%
3.40%
12.88%
37.14%
20.24%
16.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSEW vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSEW vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSEW vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.73% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.65% | 1.56% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
GSEW vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSEW vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 4.36%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.