GSJY vs. FLJP
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP).
GSJY and FLJP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSJY is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. It was launched on Mar 2, 2016. FLJP is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both GSJY and FLJP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSJY or FLJP.
Correlation
The correlation between GSJY and FLJP is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GSJY vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSJY:
0.37
FLJP:
0.39
GSJY:
0.66
FLJP:
0.68
GSJY:
1.09
FLJP:
1.09
GSJY:
0.54
FLJP:
0.57
GSJY:
1.71
FLJP:
1.65
GSJY:
4.69%
FLJP:
4.85%
GSJY:
21.49%
FLJP:
20.85%
GSJY:
-32.53%
FLJP:
-32.49%
GSJY:
-1.92%
FLJP:
-1.27%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than FLJP's 5.94% return.
GSJY
4.79%
1.49%
7.12%
8.82%
8.09%
N/A
FLJP
5.94%
2.23%
7.32%
8.43%
8.49%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSJY vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJP's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSJY vs. FLJP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSJY
FLJP
GSJY vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSJY vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison
GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than FLJP's 4.30% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.57% | 1.64% | 2.12% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.12% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.30% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.91% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSJY vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJP drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and FLJP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSJY vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) at 12.01%. This indicates that GSJY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.