PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIE vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIE vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than GINN's 8.64% return.


GSIE

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.51%
6M
9.50%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
9.08%

GINN

1D
-1.29%
1M
5.38%
YTD
8.64%
6M
7.90%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIE vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
6.51%32.53%5.23%16.99%-15.86%13.27%7.48%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
8.64%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIE and GINN is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.78

The correlation between GSIE and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSIE vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSIE
GINN

Financial Services

27.1%
11.4%

Industrials

18.0%
6.1%

Technology

9.5%
32.4%

Healthcare

9.1%
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
2.0%

Basic Materials

5.8%
0.1%

Energy

4.4%
1.4%

Communication Services

3.8%
10.8%

Utilities

3.2%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.8%

Financial Services

GSIE
27.1%
GINN
11.4%

Industrials

GSIE
18.0%
GINN
6.1%

Technology

GSIE
9.5%
GINN
32.4%

Healthcare

GSIE
9.1%
GINN
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GSIE
9.1%
GINN
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

GSIE
7.2%
GINN
2.0%

Basic Materials

GSIE
5.8%
GINN
0.1%

Energy

GSIE
4.4%
GINN
1.4%

Communication Services

GSIE
3.8%
GINN
10.8%

Utilities

GSIE
3.2%
GINN
1.9%

Real Estate

GSIE
1.2%
GINN
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIE vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIE vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIEGINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.95

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

7.06

-0.19

GSIE vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIE and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIEGINNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.61

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.32

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.45

+0.07

Drawdowns

GSIE vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and GINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIEGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-41.25%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-13.18%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

-22.25%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-41.25%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-1.63%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-13.37%

+7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.64%

-0.82%

Volatility

GSIE vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 3.98%. This indicates that GSIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIEGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

3.98%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

12.04%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

16.06%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

21.33%

-5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

21.05%

-4.30%

GSIE vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIE vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than GINN's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.52%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIE and GINN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIE has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to GINN (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs GINN's -41.25%.

On 5-year performance, GSIE leads with 8.04% vs 6.82% for GINN. On fees, GSIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSIE has performed better with a 8.04% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.16% for GINN.

GSIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GINN is Technology Equities. GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.50% for GINN.

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIE and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer