PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINN vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GINN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.


GINN

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.63%
YTD
10.05%
6M
10.24%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
0.46%
1M
10.68%
YTD
21.62%
6M
20.27%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
21.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
10.05%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.62%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and QQQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.89

The correlation between GINN and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINN vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GINN
QQQ

Technology

32.4%
53.8%

Healthcare

18.6%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
12.3%

Financial Services

11.4%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.8%
15.8%

Industrials

6.1%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
7.7%

Utilities

1.9%
1.4%

Energy

1.4%
0.6%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.1%

Technology

GINN
32.4%
QQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

GINN
18.6%
QQQ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GINN
14.6%
QQQ
12.3%

Financial Services

GINN
11.4%
QQQ
0.2%

Communication Services

GINN
10.8%
QQQ
15.8%

Industrials

GINN
6.1%
QQQ
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

GINN
2.0%
QQQ
7.7%

Utilities

GINN
1.9%
QQQ
1.4%

Energy

GINN
1.4%
QQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

GINN
0.8%
QQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

GINN
0.1%
QQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GINN vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GINNQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

2.73

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

3.55

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.71

-1.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.02

14.30

-6.28

GINN vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GINNQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.73

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.83

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.41

+0.05

Drawdowns

GINN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GINNQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.25%

-82.97%

+41.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-11.96%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

-22.77%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

-35.12%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-32.79%

+19.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

3.11%

+0.53%

Volatility

GINN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 3.66%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GINNQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

4.48%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

12.11%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

15.95%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.32%

22.39%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

22.30%

-1.25%

GINN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GINN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


GINN and QQQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to GINN (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 18.43% vs 7.37% for GINN. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

GINN is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GINN and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer