GINN vs. XT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GINN returned 5.45%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.

Performance

GINN vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 15.73% return.

GINN

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 3.65%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: —

XT

• 1D: -2.84%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 15.73%
• 6M: 14.43%
• 1Y: 37.71%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: 14.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	5.00%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	8.08%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	15.73%	26.28%	0.29%	27.02%	-27.83%	16.43%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and XT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020	0.95

The correlation between GINN and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINN vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GINN	XT
Technology	32.6%	46.7%
Healthcare	20.6%	24.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	7.4%
Financial Services	12.4%	3.0%
Communication Services	10.7%	4.1%
Industrials	4.7%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	0.0%
Energy	1.7%	0.4%
Utilities	1.7%	4.9%
Real Estate	0.6%	0.0%
Basic Materials	0.1%	1.7%

Return for Risk

GINN vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 35
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 37

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 72
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GINN	XT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	2.19	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.90	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.38	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	3.63	-2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.39	14.43	-9.04

GINN vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GINN vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and XT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINN	XT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.25%	-34.41%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	-10.45%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.25%	-22.09%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.25%	-34.41%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.93%	-4.18%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.28%	-7.39%	-5.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	2.62%	+1.13%

Volatility

GINN vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 5.81%, while iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GINN	XT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.81%	8.14%	-2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.92%	13.78%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.57%	17.32%	-0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.44%	21.00%	+0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.07%	20.12%	+0.95%

GINN vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

GINN vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than XT's 7.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.20%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	7.08%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GINN and XT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, GINN and XT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GINN or XT?

XT has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to GINN (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs XT's -34.41%.

Which ETF is better, GINN or XT?

On 5-year performance, XT leads with 7.23% vs 5.45% for GINN. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GINN or XT?

Over the 5-year period, XT has performed better with a 7.23% return vs 5.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GINN or XT?

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GINN or XT?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 1.20% for GINN.

What is the main difference between GINN and XT?

GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.46% for XT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.