PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINN vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GINN vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 20.20% return.


GINN

1D
-1.29%
1M
5.38%
YTD
8.64%
6M
7.90%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*

XT

1D
-0.47%
1M
9.47%
YTD
20.20%
6M
20.54%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
8.64%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
20.20%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and XT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.95

The correlation between GINN and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINN vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GINN
XT

Technology

32.4%
43.5%

Healthcare

18.6%
23.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
7.9%

Financial Services

11.4%
3.3%

Communication Services

10.8%
5.2%

Industrials

6.1%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
0.0%

Utilities

1.9%
4.6%

Energy

1.4%
0.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.0%

Basic Materials

0.1%
2.0%

Technology

GINN
32.4%
XT
43.5%

Healthcare

GINN
18.6%
XT
23.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GINN
14.6%
XT
7.9%

Financial Services

GINN
11.4%
XT
3.3%

Communication Services

GINN
10.8%
XT
5.2%

Industrials

GINN
6.1%
XT
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

GINN
2.0%
XT
0.0%

Utilities

GINN
1.9%
XT
4.6%

Energy

GINN
1.4%
XT
0.3%

Real Estate

GINN
0.8%
XT
0.0%

Basic Materials

GINN
0.1%
XT
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GINN vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GINNXTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

2.89

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

3.83

-1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.41

-2.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.06

18.51

-11.45

GINN vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GINNXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.89

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.41

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.66

-0.21

Drawdowns

GINN vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and XT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GINNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.25%

-34.41%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-10.45%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

-22.09%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

-34.41%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-0.47%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-7.41%

-5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

2.49%

+1.15%

Volatility

GINN vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 3.98%, while iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GINNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

4.85%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

11.94%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

15.99%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

20.76%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

20.08%

+0.97%

GINN vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

GINN vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
6.61%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GINN and XT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XT has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to GINN (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs XT's -34.41%.

On 5-year performance, XT leads with 8.42% vs 6.82% for GINN. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XT has performed better with a 8.42% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.16% for GINN.

GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.46% for XT.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GINN and XT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer