PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINN vs. ARKK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GINN vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's 1.61% return.


GINN

1D
-1.29%
1M
5.38%
YTD
8.64%
6M
7.90%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*

ARKK

1D
-2.19%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.61%
6M
-3.21%
1Y
34.90%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
-6.26%
10Y*
15.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
8.64%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
1.61%35.49%8.40%69.04%-66.97%-23.60%29.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and ARKK is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.86

The correlation between GINN and ARKK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINN vs. ARKK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GINN
ARKK

Technology

32.4%
26.4%

Healthcare

18.6%
27.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
13.7%

Financial Services

11.4%
15.4%

Communication Services

10.8%
10.9%

Industrials

6.1%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Energy

1.4%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Technology

GINN
32.4%
ARKK
26.4%

Healthcare

GINN
18.6%
ARKK
27.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GINN
14.6%
ARKK
13.7%

Financial Services

GINN
11.4%
ARKK
15.4%

Communication Services

GINN
10.8%
ARKK
10.9%

Industrials

GINN
6.1%
ARKK
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

GINN
2.0%
ARKK

-

Utilities

GINN
1.9%
ARKK

-

Energy

GINN
1.4%
ARKK

-

Real Estate

GINN
0.8%
ARKK

-

Basic Materials

GINN
0.1%
ARKK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GINN vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKK
ARKK Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ARKK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKK Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKK Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GINNARKKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.17

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.12

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.06

2.49

+4.57

GINN vs. ARKK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the ARKK Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and ARKK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GINNARKKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.96

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

-0.14

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.35

+0.10

Drawdowns

GINN vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and ARKK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GINNARKKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.25%

-80.97%

+39.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-31.35%

+18.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

-39.56%

+17.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

-77.23%

+35.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-49.39%

+47.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-30.12%

+16.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

14.06%

-10.42%

Volatility

GINN vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 3.98%, while ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GINNARKKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

9.45%

-5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

25.08%

-13.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

36.37%

-20.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

46.28%

-24.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

40.26%

-19.21%

GINN vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GINN vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.70%0.00%0.55%1.64%0.38%3.14%1.32%0.00%2.27%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GINN and ARKK have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKK has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to GINN (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs ARKK's -80.97%.

On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 6.82% vs -6.26% for ARKK. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 6.82% return vs -6.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.75% for ARKK.

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GINN and ARKK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer