PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINN vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GINN vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return.


GINN

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.63%
YTD
10.05%
6M
10.24%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
10.05%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and VOO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.89

The correlation between GINN and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINN vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GINN
VOO

Technology

32.4%
35.7%

Healthcare

18.6%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
10.2%

Financial Services

11.4%
11.6%

Communication Services

10.8%
11.3%

Industrials

6.1%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
4.9%

Utilities

1.9%
2.4%

Energy

1.4%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.9%

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.8%

Technology

GINN
32.4%
VOO
35.7%

Healthcare

GINN
18.6%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GINN
14.6%
VOO
10.2%

Financial Services

GINN
11.4%
VOO
11.6%

Communication Services

GINN
10.8%
VOO
11.3%

Industrials

GINN
6.1%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

GINN
2.0%
VOO
4.9%

Utilities

GINN
1.9%
VOO
2.4%

Energy

GINN
1.4%
VOO
3.5%

Real Estate

GINN
0.8%
VOO
1.9%

Basic Materials

GINN
0.1%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GINN vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GINNVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

2.53

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

3.43

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.42

-1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.02

15.95

-7.92

GINN vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GINNVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.53

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.85

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.89

-0.43

Drawdowns

GINN vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GINNVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.25%

-33.99%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-8.90%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

-18.69%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

-24.52%

-16.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-3.69%

-9.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

1.91%

+1.73%

Volatility

GINN vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that GINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GINNVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

2.74%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

8.88%

+3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

11.78%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.32%

16.81%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

18.01%

+3.04%

GINN vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GINN vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GINN and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GINN has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 14.26% vs 7.37% for GINN. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

GINN is categorized as Technology Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GINN and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer