GSEW vs. ILCB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GSEW tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEW returned 8.63%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for ILCB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSEW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.

Performance

GSEW vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return.

GSEW

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 6M: 9.82%
• 1Y: 18.80%
• 3Y*: 17.43%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: —

ILCB

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 6M: 11.10%
• 1Y: 28.03%
• 3Y*: 22.69%
• 5Y*: 13.45%
• 10Y*: 15.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEW vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	9.52%	11.97%	16.89%	17.80%	-17.54%	25.43%	16.28%	31.04%	-8.11%	7.67%
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF	11.12%	17.70%	24.96%	26.91%	-19.48%	24.07%	19.40%	32.68%	-8.51%	6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and ILCB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017	0.91

The correlation between GSEW and ILCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSEW vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSEW	ILCB
Technology	20.9%	35.5%
Industrials	15.6%	8.6%
Financial Services	14.3%	11.7%
Healthcare	11.3%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	10.1%
Utilities	5.8%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	4.8%
Energy	4.9%	3.5%
Basic Materials	4.6%	1.8%
Real Estate	4.0%	1.8%
Communication Services	3.5%	11.4%

Return for Risk

GSEW vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW

GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 46
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 54

ILCB

ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 69
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSEW	ILCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	2.35	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.20	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.42	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	3.10	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.35	14.24	-4.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSEW vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSEW	ILCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	2.35	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.79	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.64	-0.02

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and ILCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSEW	ILCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.65%	-51.53%	+12.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	-9.09%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.18%	-19.05%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	-25.47%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.67%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-6.24%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	1.97%	+0.05%

Volatility

GSEW vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) have volatilities of 2.76% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSEW	ILCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	2.88%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.05%	9.10%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.12%	12.02%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.91%	17.13%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.20%	18.16%	+1.04%

GSEW vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GSEW vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than ILCB's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	1.42%	1.52%	1.46%	1.64%	1.74%	1.34%	1.53%	1.66%	1.56%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF	0.97%	1.11%	1.19%	1.43%	1.65%	1.16%	1.26%	2.25%	2.17%	1.81%	1.97%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSEW and ILCB in my portfolio?

GSEW and ILCB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSEW or ILCB?

ILCB has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

Which ETF is better, GSEW or ILCB?

On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 13.45% vs 8.63% for GSEW. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSEW or ILCB?

Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSEW or ILCB?

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSEW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSEW or ILCB?

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.97% for ILCB.

What is the main difference between GSEW and ILCB?

GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.03% for ILCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.