PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ILCB vs. ILCG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ILCB and ILCG is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

ILCB vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
19.23%
ILCB
ILCG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ILCB:

2.13

ILCG:

1.93

Sortino Ratio

ILCB:

2.82

ILCG:

2.53

Omega Ratio

ILCB:

1.39

ILCG:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

ILCB:

0.27

ILCG:

2.71

Martin Ratio

ILCB:

13.08

ILCG:

10.61

Ulcer Index

ILCB:

2.10%

ILCG:

3.27%

Daily Std Dev

ILCB:

12.93%

ILCG:

17.99%

Max Drawdown

ILCB:

-100.00%

ILCG:

-52.98%

Current Drawdown

ILCB:

-99.99%

ILCG:

-0.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCB has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 13.02%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.23% annualized return.


ILCB

YTD

3.94%

1M

1.16%

6M

12.87%

1Y

26.82%

5Y*

14.29%

10Y*

13.02%

ILCG

YTD

4.75%

1M

1.13%

6M

19.23%

1Y

34.38%

5Y*

17.35%

10Y*

16.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ILCB vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for ILCG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%
Expense ratio chart for ILCB: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ILCB vs. ILCG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ILCB is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ILCB is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ILCB is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ILCB is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ILCB is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ILCB is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ILCG is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ILCG is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ILCG is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ILCG is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ILCG is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ILCG is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ILCB vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ILCB, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.131.93
The chart of Sortino ratio for ILCB, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.822.53
The chart of Omega ratio for ILCB, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.391.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for ILCB, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.272.71
The chart of Martin ratio for ILCB, currently valued at 13.08, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.0810.61
ILCB
ILCG

The current ILCB Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCB and ILCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.13
1.93
ILCB
ILCG

Dividends

ILCB vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than ILCG's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
1.14%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%1.86%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.47%0.50%0.69%0.76%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%0.87%

Drawdowns

ILCB vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than ILCG's maximum drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and ILCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-99.99%
-0.39%
ILCB
ILCG

Volatility

ILCB vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) is 3.99%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that ILCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.99%
5.48%
ILCB
ILCG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab