ILCB vs. BBUS
ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ILCB returned 13.05%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for BBUS. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ILCB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
ILCB vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 9.41% return.
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- 1Y
- 26.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 10.02% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 19.43% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 9.41% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCB and BBUS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between ILCB and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCB vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCB
BBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ILCB
BBUS
Financial Services
ILCB
BBUS
Communication Services
ILCB
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
ILCB
BBUS
Industrials
ILCB
BBUS
Healthcare
ILCB
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
ILCB
BBUS
Energy
ILCB
BBUS
Utilities
ILCB
BBUS
Basic Materials
ILCB
BBUS
Real Estate
ILCB
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCB vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
ILCB
BBUS
ILCB vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCB | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.38 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 2.85 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 12.65 | +0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCB vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCB | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.53% | -35.35% | -16.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -9.21% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -19.01% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -25.46% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -1.82% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -5.43% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.07% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ILCB vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCB | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 4.70% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 9.81% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.60% | 12.49% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 17.12% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 19.59% | -1.38% |
ILCB vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCB vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than BBUS's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ILCB and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBUS has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to ILCB (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCB dropped -51.53% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 13.05% vs 13.03% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for ILCB.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.98% for ILCB.
ILCB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ILCB and 0.02% for BBUS.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCB and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer