ILCB vs. BBUS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS).
ILCB and BBUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILCB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. BBUS is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 2019. Both ILCB and BBUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ILCB or BBUS.
Key characteristics
ILCB | BBUS | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 27.36% | 26.95% |
1Y Return | 38.55% | 38.06% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 9.59% | 9.68% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 15.07% | 15.90% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.28 | 3.09 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.35 | 4.09 |
Omega Ratio | 1.62 | 1.58 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.41 | 4.45 |
Martin Ratio | 21.31 | 20.37 |
Ulcer Index | 1.91% | 1.86% |
Daily Std Dev | 12.37% | 12.29% |
Max Drawdown | -100.00% | -35.35% |
Current Drawdown | -99.99% | -0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCB and BBUS is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ILCB vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ILCB having a 27.36% return and BBUS slightly lower at 26.95%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILCB vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ILCB vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ILCB vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, which matches BBUS's 1.18% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 1.18% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% | 1.86% | 1.89% |
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.18% | 1.39% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ILCB vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and BBUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ILCB vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.