ILCB vs. VOO
ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCB returned 15.13%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
ILCB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ILCB having a 10.02% return and VOO slightly lower at 9.75%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ILCB having a 15.13% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 15.77%.
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- 1Y
- 26.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
ILCB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 10.02% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 32.68% | -8.51% | 22.09% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCB and VOO is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.97 |
The correlation between ILCB and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCB vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCB
VOO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ILCB
VOO
Financial Services
ILCB
VOO
Communication Services
ILCB
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
ILCB
VOO
Industrials
ILCB
VOO
Healthcare
ILCB
VOO
Consumer Defensive
ILCB
VOO
Energy
ILCB
VOO
Utilities
ILCB
VOO
Basic Materials
ILCB
VOO
Real Estate
ILCB
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
ILCB
VOO
ILCB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 3.02 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 13.58 | -0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.53% | -33.99% | -17.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -8.90% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -18.69% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -24.52% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.30% | -33.99% | -1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -1.74% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -3.68% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.98% | +0.06% |
Volatility
ILCB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 4.60% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 9.73% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.60% | 12.39% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 16.90% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 18.05% | +0.16% |
ILCB vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ILCB and VOO have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ILCB and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ILCB has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCB dropped -51.53% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 15.13% for ILCB. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB and VOO have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.98% for ILCB.
ILCB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCB and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer