GLTR vs. GLL
GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLTR returned 9.97%/yr vs -20.49%/yr for GLL. Their -0.91 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GLL.
Performance
GLTR vs. GLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a -11.69% return, which is significantly lower than GLL's 1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has outperformed GLL with an annualized return of 9.97%, while GLL has yielded a comparatively lower -20.49% annualized return.
GLTR
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- 6M
- -22.36%
- YTD
- -11.69%
- 1Y
- 28.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.70%
GLL
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 33.97%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- -39.14%
- 3Y*
- -38.51%
- 5Y*
- -27.47%
- 10Y*
- -20.49%
- ALL TIME*
- -21.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.26M | $37.47M | $59.93M | |
| $15.88M | $12.93M | $13.80M |
GLTR vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -11.69% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 1.34% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -26.95% | 5.39% | -23.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and GLL is -0.92, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2010 | -0.91 |
The correlation between GLTR and GLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
GLL
GLTR vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLTR | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.88 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | -0.65 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | -0.94 | +2.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum GLL drawdown of -99.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and GLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -99.24% | +43.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.87% | -64.23% | +26.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.87% | -87.95% | +50.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.87% | -89.76% | +51.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.87% | -95.76% | +57.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.34% | -98.74% | +62.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -85.23% | +56.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.83% | 44.60% | -25.77% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 7.95%, while ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a volatility of 12.63%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 12.63% | -4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.42% | 45.01% | -10.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.52% | 55.39% | -15.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 36.88% | -12.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 32.48% | -11.68% |
GLTR vs. GLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GLL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLTR vs. GLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLTR nor GLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTR and GLL have a correlation of -0.92, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLL has higher volatility (12.63%) compared to GLTR (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs GLL's -99.24%.
On 10-year performance, GLTR leads with 9.97% vs -20.49% for GLL. On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GLTR has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 9.97% return vs -20.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLL.
GLTR and GLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLL is Leveraged Commodities. GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%). They also come from different issuers: abrdn and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.95% for GLL.
GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and GLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer