GLTR vs. SGOL

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly lower than SGOL's 30.30% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has underperformed SGOL with an annualized return of 8.33%, while SGOL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.90% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOL's 0.17% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the SGOL Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and SGOL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither GLTR nor SGOL has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than SGOL's maximum drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and SGOL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 7.12%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a volatility of 8.87%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.