GLTR vs. GLD

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 21.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 7.29%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither GLTR nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 7.19%, while SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.