PortfoliosLab logo
GLTR vs. BAR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GLTR and BAR is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

GLTR vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
101.53%
149.13%
GLTR
BAR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLTR:

1.72

BAR:

2.59

Sortino Ratio

GLTR:

2.35

BAR:

3.45

Omega Ratio

GLTR:

1.29

BAR:

1.44

Calmar Ratio

GLTR:

2.25

BAR:

5.46

Martin Ratio

GLTR:

7.60

BAR:

14.61

Ulcer Index

GLTR:

4.42%

BAR:

3.00%

Daily Std Dev

GLTR:

19.59%

BAR:

17.02%

Max Drawdown

GLTR:

-55.70%

BAR:

-21.53%

Current Drawdown

GLTR:

-2.13%

BAR:

-2.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 21.08% return, which is significantly lower than BAR's 26.84% return.


GLTR

YTD

21.08%

1M

9.05%

6M

12.67%

1Y

34.02%

5Y*

11.73%

10Y*

8.05%

BAR

YTD

26.84%

1M

9.69%

6M

21.49%

1Y

44.35%

5Y*

14.35%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLTR vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for GLTR: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
GLTR: 0.60%
Expense ratio chart for BAR: current value is 0.17%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BAR: 0.17%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLTR vs. BAR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLTR is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLTR is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLTR is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLTR is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLTR is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLTR is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAR is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAR is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAR is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAR is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAR is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAR is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLTR vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
GLTR: 1.72
BAR: 2.59
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
GLTR: 2.35
BAR: 3.45
The chart of Omega ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
GLTR: 1.29
BAR: 1.44
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 3.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
GLTR: 3.29
BAR: 5.46
The chart of Martin ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 7.60, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
GLTR: 7.60
BAR: 14.61

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the BAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and BAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.72
2.59
GLTR
BAR

Dividends

GLTR vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLTR nor BAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLTR vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and BAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-2.13%
-2.78%
GLTR
BAR

Volatility

GLTR vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 7.76%, while GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) has a volatility of 9.10%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.76%
9.10%
GLTR
BAR