GLTR vs. VGPMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX).
GLTR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. VGPMX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 23, 1984.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLTR or VGPMX.
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and VGPMX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GLTR vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLTR:
1.49
VGPMX:
0.47
GLTR:
2.05
VGPMX:
0.72
GLTR:
1.26
VGPMX:
1.09
GLTR:
1.06
VGPMX:
0.15
GLTR:
6.50
VGPMX:
1.85
GLTR:
4.33%
VGPMX:
3.85%
GLTR:
18.90%
VGPMX:
15.05%
GLTR:
-55.70%
VGPMX:
-79.32%
GLTR:
-6.38%
VGPMX:
-42.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than VGPMX's 2.14% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has outperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 5.70%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.79% annualized return.
GLTR
3.82%
1.20%
6.07%
29.34%
7.07%
5.70%
VGPMX
2.14%
-3.44%
-5.43%
9.95%
11.70%
4.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLTR vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLTR vs. VGPMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLTR
VGPMX
GLTR vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLTR vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison
GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund | 0.23% | 0.24% | 3.22% | 3.27% | 3.26% | 2.03% | 2.39% | 3.01% | 0.02% | 1.71% | 2.33% |
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -79.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and VGPMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLTR vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 4.57%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.