PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLTR vs. PICK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GLTRPICK
YTD Return25.96%-3.70%
1Y Return33.44%12.36%
3Y Return (Ann)7.68%4.77%
5Y Return (Ann)9.69%12.41%
10Y Return (Ann)6.66%6.50%
Sharpe Ratio1.790.54
Sortino Ratio2.430.89
Omega Ratio1.311.11
Calmar Ratio1.220.54
Martin Ratio9.691.33
Ulcer Index3.43%9.06%
Daily Std Dev18.61%22.38%
Max Drawdown-55.70%-68.88%
Current Drawdown-5.84%-12.44%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GLTR and PICK is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GLTR vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 25.96% return, which is significantly higher than PICK's -3.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLTR having a 6.66% annualized return and PICK not far behind at 6.50%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.26%
-5.65%
GLTR
PICK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLTR vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.


GLTR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF
Expense ratio chart for GLTR: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for PICK: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLTR vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLTR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 9.69, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.69
PICK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PICK, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.54
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PICK, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.33

GLTR vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and PICK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.79
0.54
GLTR
PICK

Dividends

GLTR vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GLTR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
3.72%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%2.88%3.39%

Drawdowns

GLTR vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and PICK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.84%
-12.44%
GLTR
PICK

Volatility

GLTR vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 6.37%, while iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.37%
6.90%
GLTR
PICK