GLTR vs. PICK

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly higher than PICK's 5.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has outperformed PICK with an annualized return of 7.42%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively lower 6.04% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the PICK Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and PICK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%.

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and PICK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 5.78%. This indicates that GLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.