PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINN vs. GSIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GINN vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than GSIE's 6.51% return.


GINN

1D
-1.29%
1M
5.38%
YTD
8.64%
6M
7.90%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*

GSIE

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.51%
6M
9.50%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
8.64%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
6.51%32.53%5.23%16.99%-15.86%13.27%7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and GSIE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.78

The correlation between GINN and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINN vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GINN
GSIE

Technology

32.4%
9.5%

Healthcare

18.6%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
9.1%

Financial Services

11.4%
27.1%

Communication Services

10.8%
3.8%

Industrials

6.1%
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
7.2%

Utilities

1.9%
3.2%

Energy

1.4%
4.4%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.2%

Basic Materials

0.1%
5.8%

Technology

GINN
32.4%
GSIE
9.5%

Healthcare

GINN
18.6%
GSIE
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GINN
14.6%
GSIE
9.1%

Financial Services

GINN
11.4%
GSIE
27.1%

Communication Services

GINN
10.8%
GSIE
3.8%

Industrials

GINN
6.1%
GSIE
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

GINN
2.0%
GSIE
7.2%

Utilities

GINN
1.9%
GSIE
3.2%

Energy

GINN
1.4%
GSIE
4.4%

Real Estate

GINN
0.8%
GSIE
1.2%

Basic Materials

GINN
0.1%
GSIE
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GINN vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GINNGSIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.81

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.06

6.87

+0.19

GINN vs. GSIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the GSIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and GSIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GINNGSIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.38

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.50

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.52

-0.07

Drawdowns

GINN vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than GSIE's maximum drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and GSIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GINNGSIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.25%

-34.63%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-10.76%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

-13.07%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

-29.97%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-2.19%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-6.06%

-7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

2.82%

+0.82%

Volatility

GINN vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 3.98%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GINNGSIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

4.38%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

11.60%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

14.15%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

16.04%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

16.75%

+4.30%

GINN vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GINN vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than GSIE's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.52%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GINN and GSIE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIE has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to GINN (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs GSIE's -34.63%.

On 5-year performance, GSIE leads with 8.04% vs 6.82% for GINN. On fees, GSIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSIE has performed better with a 8.04% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.16% for GINN.

GINN is categorized as Technology Equities, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.25% for GSIE.

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GINN and GSIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer