PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGUS vs. GSIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GGUS vs. GSIE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE).

GGUS and GSIE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 28, 2023. GSIE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2015. Both GGUS and GSIE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GGUS vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GGUS vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
GGUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF		-8.81%17.32%30.88%4.54%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF		0.78%32.53%5.23%4.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a -8.81% return, which is significantly lower than GSIE's 0.78% return.

GGUS

1D
3.65%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
-8.81%
6M
-8.20%
1Y
17.99%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

GSIE

1D
3.03%
1M
-7.23%
YTD
0.78%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.47%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
8.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF

Often compared with GGUS:
GGUS vs. IVVGGUS vs. GCORGGUS vs. SCHGGGUS vs. GUSAGGUS vs. YMAGGGUS vs. GDOCGGUS vs. VGT
Often compared with GSIE:
GSIE vs. VXUSGSIE vs. DBAWGSIE vs. ICOWGSIE vs. QEFAGSIE vs. VOOGSIE vs. VEAGSIE vs. SCHF

GGUS vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
GGUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF

Return for Risk

GGUS vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGUS
GGUS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGUS vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GGUSGSIEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

1.38

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

2.01

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.30

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

2.17

-0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.22

8.47

-4.25

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGUS vs. GSIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the GSIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGUS and GSIE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GGUSGSIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.38

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.52

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.53

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.49

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between GGUS and GSIE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GGUS vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison

GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than GSIE's 2.66% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF		0.48%0.43%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF		2.66%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%

Drawdowns

GGUS vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and GSIE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

GGUSGSIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-34.63%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-10.76%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-29.97%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.63%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.80%

-7.45%

-4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-6.11%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

2.76%

+1.54%

Volatility

GGUS vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) is 6.60%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that GGUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

GGUSGSIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

7.38%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

10.54%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.80%

17.78%

+4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

15.92%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

16.70%

+2.59%