GGUS vs. GCOR
GGUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF) and GCOR (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GCOR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Broad Bond Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GGUS returned 23.97% vs 4.97% for GCOR. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GGUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for GCOR.
Performance
GGUS vs. GCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than GCOR's 0.16% return.
GGUS
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
GGUS vs. GCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 7.56% | 17.32% | 30.88% | 4.54% |
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.16% | 7.22% | 0.51% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGUS and GCOR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.14 |
The correlation between GGUS and GCOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGUS vs. GCOR — Risk / Return Rank
GGUS
GCOR
GGUS vs. GCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGUS | GCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.77 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | 5.42 | +0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGUS | GCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.37 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | -0.10 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
GGUS vs. GCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than GCOR's maximum drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and GCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGUS | GCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -18.94% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -2.82% | -12.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -3.52% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -7.99% | +4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 0.92% | +3.41% |
Volatility
GGUS vs. GCOR - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) at 1.27%. This indicates that GGUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGUS | GCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 1.27% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 2.65% | +8.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 3.65% | +11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 5.81% | +13.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 5.52% | +13.44% |
GGUS vs. GCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOR's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GGUS vs. GCOR - Dividend Comparison
GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than GCOR's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.17% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 3.67% | 2.11% | 0.92% | 0.24% |
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 0.41% | 0.43% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGUS and GCOR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGUS has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to GCOR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGUS dropped -22.59% vs GCOR's -18.94%.
On 1-year performance, GGUS leads with 23.97% vs 4.97% for GCOR. On fees, GCOR is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GGUS has performed better with a 23.97% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GCOR is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GGUS.
GCOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 0.41% for GGUS.
GGUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GCOR is Intermediate Core Bond. GGUS tracks Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GCOR tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Broad Bond Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GGUS and 0.08% for GCOR.
GGUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGUS and GCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer